The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention: does UV protection conflict with the need to raise low levels of vitamin D?
- PMID: 20959891
- PMCID: PMC2956195
- DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0638
The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention: does UV protection conflict with the need to raise low levels of vitamin D?
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D is essential for life. Part of the body's supply of vitamin D is ingested in food, but UV induced vitamin D synthesis in the body plays an even more important role. UV irradiation is a cause for the currently rising incidence of skin cancer in many countries; on the other hand, Vitamin D might be protective against some cancers. In this paper we summarize the current data on vitamin D and cancer and on the vitamin D status of populations in Europe and discuss whether current recommendations on UV protection require changes.
Methods: In 2008, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a systematic review on vitamin D and cancer. We describe its main findings and review additional publications retrieved by a selective literature search on vitamin D, UV light, and skin cancer. In addition, we systematically review the current recommendations on vitamin D supplementation.
Results: Higher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of colon cancer. For breast cancer, the situation is less clear. In general, higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower overall mortality. Concerning optimal Vitamin D levels, serum values ≥ 50 nmol/L (ie.. ≥ 20 ng/mL) are frequently discussed, and a few authors favor markedly higher values. Brief UV exposures are usually adequate for endogenous vitamin D synthesis.
Conclusion: More research is needed into the possible protective effects of vitamin D against cancer. Brief, daily UV exposure stimulates vitamin D production and causes negligible skin damage. Raising the vitamin D level even further by extended solar UV exposure or irradiation in a solarium is inadvisable because of the risk of skin cancer. Oral vitamin D supplementation can be considered as an alternative, particularly for persons at high risk, such as the elderly and members of certain ethnic groups.
Comment in
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Association studies often lack plausibility: back to the future of mechanisms.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 May;108(18):321. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0321b. Epub 2011 May 6. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 21629518 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence (letter to the editor): Benefits outweigh risks.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 May;108(18):321. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0321a. Epub 2011 May 6. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011. PMID: 21629519 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Webb AR, Pilbeam C, Hanafin N, Holick MF. An evaluation of the relative contributions of exposure to sunlight and of diet to the circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in an elderly nursing home population in Boston. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:1075–1081. - PubMed
-
- Holick MF, Chen TC. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1080S–1086S. - PubMed
-
- Davis CD. Vitamin D and cancer: current dilemmas and future research needs. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:565S–569S. - PubMed
-
- Wei MY, Garland CF, Gorham ED, Mohr SB, Giovannucci E. Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2958–2969. - PubMed
-
- Bertone-Johnson ER. Vitamin D and Breast Cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:462–467. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
