Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov;81(11):974-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1930-6.

[Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Protective ileostoma versus protective transverse stoma. What evidence is available?]

[Article in German]
C D Klink et al. Chirurg. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

The clinical outcome of anastomotic leakage in colorectal and coloanal anastomoses necessitates a loop stoma for fecal diversion. Controversy remains of the most suitable position of the stoma. In this respect a loop ileostomy or loop colostomy can be performed. The aim of this study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of both surgical strategies from the literature and to derive possible recommendations. Both methods provide a good operative outcome with low complication rates. Overall there is a trend towards ileostomy because of lower complication rates after stoma creation and the incidence of sepsis and stoma prolapse in particular is significantly reduced after ileostomy. Concerning stoma reversal both methods seem to be equivalent. As long as no large evidenced-based, randomized studies are available loop ileostomy seems to be the most appropriate surgical procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World J Surg. 2007 May;31(5):1142-51 - PubMed
    1. Asian J Surg. 2004 Jul;27(3):202-10; discussion 211-2 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):479-88 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2001 Mar;25(3):274-7; discussion 277-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):52-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources