Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jan;54(1):25-31.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1933-3. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Intensive glycaemic control and cancer risk in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of major trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Intensive glycaemic control and cancer risk in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of major trials

J A Johnson et al. Diabetologia. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes and risk of cancer incidence or cancer mortality. We were interested to determine if data from major randomised controlled trials would support a hypothesis that improving glycaemic control may reduce the risk of cancer outcomes.

Methods: We included major randomised controlled trials conducted with an overall aim of intensified glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. We abstracted data from published papers and supplemental material and conducted separate meta-analyses of cancer mortality and cancer incidence.

Results: Four trials reported cancer mortality for the intensive (222 events in 53,892 person-years) and standard control (155 events in 38,743 person-years) arms (UK Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS] 33, UKPDS 34, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD] and Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial [VADT]); the summary risk ratio for cancer mortality was 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.24; I² = 0%). Excluding the UKPDS metformin trial resulted in a pooled risk estimate of 1.03 (95% CI 0.83-1.29; I² = 0%). Three trials reported cancer incidence for the study arms (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE], PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events [PROactive], Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes [RECORD]) with 357 events in 47,974 person-years with improved glycaemic control and 380 events in 45,009 person-years in the control arms; the pooled risk ratio for cancer incidence was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79-1.05; I² = 0%).

Conclusions/interpretation: Data from large randomised controlled trials of intensified glycaemic control suggest that cancer risk is not reduced by improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. These data therefore do not support the hypothesis that hyperglycaemia is causally linked to increased cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007 Sep;23(6):479-84 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2010 Feb 3;303(5):446-7 - PubMed
    1. Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1755-65 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 6;92(11):2076-83 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources