Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;22(3):839-47.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1461-5. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement

Affiliations

Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement

W D Leslie et al. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

The FRAX® tool estimates a 10-year probability of fracture based upon multiple clinical risk factors and an optional bone mineral density (BMD) measurement obtained from the femoral neck. We describe a simple procedure for using lumbar spine BMD to enhance fracture risk assessment under the FRAX system.

Introduction: Discordance between lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) T-scores is common and a source of clinical confusion since the LS measurement is not an input variable for the FRAX algorithm. The purpose of this study is to develop a procedure for adjusting FRAX probability based upon the T-score difference between the LS and FN (termed offset).

Methods: The Manitoba BMD database was used to identify baseline LS and FN dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations (33,850 women and 2,518 men age 50 and older) with FRAX estimates for a major osteoporotic fracture categorized as low (<10%), moderate (10-20%), and high (>20%). Fracture outcomes were assessed from population-based administrative data. An approach was developed and internally validated using a split-cohort design.

Results: The offset was found to significantly affect fracture risk [HR, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06-1.18) per SD LS below FN] independent of the FRAX probability. The following rule was formulated: "Increase/decrease FRAX estimate for a major fracture by one tenth for each rounded T-score difference between LS and FN." In the validation subgroup, there was a significant improvement in the fracture prediction using FRAX with the proposed offset adjustment for major osteoporotic (P = 0.007) and vertebral fracture prediction (P < 0.001). For those at moderate risk under FRAX, 12.6% showed reclassification using the offset to a risk level that more accurately reflected their observed risk (25.2% reclassification for moderate risk discordant cases).

Conclusion: A simple procedure that incorporates the offset between the LS and FN T-scores can enhance fracture risk prediction under the FRAX system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27;167(15):1641-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Densitom. 2005 Spring;8(1):25-30 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Feb;20(2):195-201 - PubMed
    1. Ann Pharmacother. 1998 Nov;32(11):1152-7 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Nov;18(11):1955-63 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources