Comparison of immediate vs early invasive strategy in patients with first acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- PMID: 20960541
- PMCID: PMC6653721
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.20785
Comparison of immediate vs early invasive strategy in patients with first acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background: The best timing for coronary angiography (immediate vs early) in patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is controversial.
Hypothesis: Evaluate in NSTEMI patients the effects of an immediate compared to an early invasive strategy on microvascular damage, myocardial perfusion, and infarct size.
Methods: We randomized 54 consecutive patients with first episode of NSTEMI: 27 patients (22 males, age 58.8 ± 9.4 years, group A) underwent immediate (≤6 hours) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a double bolus of eptifibatide, and 27 patients (24 males, age 59.7 ± 9.8 years, P = 0.72, group B) underwent early (7-72 hours) PCI with upstream eptifibatide. Microvascular damage was evaluated at predischarge by myocardial contrast echocardiography, and the contrast defect length was calculated.
Results: There were no significant differences in pre-PCI myocardial blush grade (MBG) (41% MBG 0 or 1 in group A vs 37% MBG 0 or 1 in group B, P = 0.78), in post-PCI MBG (7.4% MBG 0 or 1 in both groups, P = 1.00), and in contrast defect length (4.5% in group A vs 2.8% in group B, P = 0.56). However, group A showed a significant reduction in creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzyme peak (26 ± 26 ng/mL in group A vs 69 ± 79 ng/mL in group B, P = 0.01) and in troponin T peak (0.84 ± 1.2 ng/mL in group A vs 1.8 ± 2.1 ng/mL in group B, P = 0.048).
Conclusions: In patients with NSTEMI treated with eptifibatide, immediate PCI is associated with less increase in myonecrosis markers compared with PCI within 72 hours. There were no significant differences in myocardial perfusion between the 2 strategies.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures
References
-
- Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Rassi AN, et al. Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta‐analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1319–1325. - PubMed
-
- Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non‐ST‐segment acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–1660. - PubMed
-
- Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2007;116:803–877. - PubMed
-
- Zhao XQ, Théroux P, Snapinn SM, et al. Intracoronary thrombus and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with tirofiban in unstable angina or non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction: angiographic results from the PRISM‐PLUS trial. Circulation. 1999;100:1609–1615. - PubMed
-
- Van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, Steg PG, et al. Assessment of coronary angiograms prior to and after treatment with abciximab, and the outcome of angioplasty in refractory unstable angina patients: angiographic results from the CAPTURE trial. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1572–1578. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
