Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Nov;12(9):649-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00221.x.

Resection margin in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a comparative study between wedge resection and anatomic left lateral sectionectomy

Kit-fai Lee  1 , Jeff Wong, Yue-sun Cheung, Philip Ip, John Wong, Paul B S Lai
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Resection margin in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a comparative study between wedge resection and anatomic left lateral sectionectomy

Kit-fai Lee et al. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Experience from open hepatectomy shows that anatomic liver resection achieves a better resection margin than wedge resection. In recent years, laparoscopic hepatectomy has increasingly been performed in patients with liver pathology including malignant lesions. Wedge resection (WR) and left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), which also represent non-anatomic and anatomic resection respectively, are the two most common types of laparoscopic hepatectomy performed. The aim of the present study was to compare the two types of laparoscopic hepatectomy with emphasis on resection margin.

Methods: Between November 2003 and July 2009, 44 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy were identified and retrospectively reviewed. The WR and LLS group of patients were compared in terms of operative outcomes, pathological findings, recurrence patterns and survival.

Results: Out of the 44 patients, 21 underwent LLS and 23 a WR. The two groups of patients were comparable in demographics. The two groups did not differ in conversion rate, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality, morbidity and post-operative length of stay. The LLS group patients had significantly larger liver lesions, wider resection margin and less sub-centimetre margins. In patients with malignant liver lesions, there was no difference between the two groups in incidence of intra-hepatic recurrence and 3-year overall and disease-free survival.

Conclusion: Operative outcomes are similar between laparoscopic WR and LLS. However, WR is less reliable than LLS in achieving a resection margin of more than 1 cm. Larger studies involving more patients with longer follow-up are warranted to determine the impact of the resection margin on intra-hepatic recurrence and survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic drawing showing lines of transection for a segment 2/3 tumour. A-A: left lateral sectionectomy: B-B: wedge resection: M: site of the resection margin most commonly involved during wedge resection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection – 2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–841. - PubMed
    1. Vigano L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:410–421. - PubMed
    1. Dagher I, O'Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009;250:856–860. - PubMed
    1. Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Wong J. Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical reappraisal. Ann Surg. 2000;231:544–551. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi M, Guo RP, Lin XJ, Zhang YQ, Chen MS, Zhang CQ, et al. Partial hepatectomy with wide vs. narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2007;245:36–43. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms