Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Oct 20:10:123.
doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-123.

Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre

Fabrizio Cardin et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Achieving the target of 95% colonoscopy completion rate at centres conducting colorectal screening programs is an important issue. Large centres and teaching hospitals employing endoscopists with different levels of training and expertise risk achieving worse results. Deep sedation with propofol in routine colonoscopy could maximize the results of cecal intubation.

Methods: The present study on the experience of a single centre focused on estimating the overall completion rate of colonoscopies performed under routine propofol sedation at a large teaching hospital with many operators involved, and on assessing the factors that influence the success rate of the procedure and how to improve this performance, analyzing the aspects relating to using of deep sedation. Twenty-one endoscopists, classified by their level of specialization in colonoscopic practice, performed 1381 colonoscopies under deep sedation. All actions needed for the anaesthesiologist to restore adequate oxygenation or hemodynamics, even for transient changes, were recorded.

Results: The "crude" overall completion rate was 93.3%. This finding shows that with routine deep sedation, the colonoscopy completion rate nears, but still does not reach, the target performance for colonoscopic screening programs, at centers where colonoscopists of difference experience are employed in such programs.Factors interfering with cecal intubation were: inadequate colon cleansing, endoscopists' expertise in colonoscopic practice, patients' body weight under 60 kg or age over 71 years, and the need for active intervention by the anaesthesiologist. The most favourable situation--a patient less than 71 years old with a body weight over 60 kg, an adequate bowel preparation, a "highly experienced specialist" performing the test, and no need for active anaesthesiological intervention during the procedure--coincided with a 98.8% probability of the colonoscopy being completed.

Conclusions: With routine deep sedation, the colonoscopy completion rate nears the target performance for colonoscopic screening programs, at centers where colonoscopists of difference experience are employed in such programs. Organizing the daily workload to prevent negative factors affecting the success rate from occurring in combination may enable up to 85% of incomplete procedures to be converted into successful colonoscopies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage variations in colonoscopy success rates by patients' characteristics. This figure shows the percentage variations in colonoscopy success rate by level of experience of the endoscopists, age of the patient, body weight of the patients and bowel preparation.

References

    1. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2866–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00905.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inadomi JM. In search of quality colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1845–62. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH. U.S Multy-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6):1296–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05812.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kozarek RA, Botoman VA, Patterson DJ. Prospective evaluation of a small caliber endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful examination. Gastointest Endosc. 1989;35:333–5. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(89)72804-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomized controlled trial. Gut. 2000;46:801–5. doi: 10.1136/gut.46.6.801. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types