Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;17(6):507-16.
doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283405921.

Prenatal stress and developmental programming of human health and disease risk: concepts and integration of empirical findings

Affiliations
Review

Prenatal stress and developmental programming of human health and disease risk: concepts and integration of empirical findings

Sonja Entringer et al. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The concept of the developmental origins of health and disease susceptibility is rapidly attracting interest and gaining prominence as a complementary approach to understanding the causation of many complex common disorders that confer a major burden of disease; however several important issues and questions remain to be addressed, particularly in the context of humans.

Recent findings: In this review we enunciate some of these questions and issues, review empirical evidence primarily from our own recent studies on prenatal stress and stress biology, and discuss putative maternal-placental-fetal endocrine and immune/inflammatory candidate mechanisms that may underlie and mediate short-term and long-term effects of prenatal stress on the developing human embryo and fetus, with a specific focus on body composition, metabolic function, and obesity risk.

Summary: The implications for research and clinical practice are discussed with a summary of recent advances in noninvasive methods to characterize fetal, newborn, infant, and child developmental and health-related processes that, when coupled with available state-of-the-art statistical modeling approaches for longitudinal, repeated measures time series analysis, now afford unprecedented opportunities to explore and uncover the developmental origins of human health and disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of a biobehavioral model in humans of prenatal stress-related maternal–placental–fetal endocrine and immune processes and programming of health and disease risk
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mean glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and leptin responses (±SEM) to an oral glucose tolerance test in prenatally stressed (PS, ‘black circles’) and comparison group (CG, ‘white triangles’) individuals (left panel)
Glucose levels were not significantly different across the groups, however, PS individuals showed significantly elevated 2 h insulin (P=0.01) and C-peptide levels (P=0.03), as well as higher leptin levels at all time points during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (P=0.05). In addition, PS individuals had a higher % body fat and a higher BMI (P=0.04, right panel). Adapted with permission from [23].

Comment in

References

    1. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004;305:1733–1736. - PubMed
    1. Glynn LM, Wadhwa PD, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. When stress happens matters: effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:637–642. - PubMed
    1. Feldman PJ, Dunkel-Schetter C, Sandman CA, Wadhwa PD. Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:715–725. - PubMed
    1. Rini CK, Dunkel-Schetter C, Wadhwa PD, Sandman CA. Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: the role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychol. 1999;18:333–345. - PubMed
    1. Wadhwa PD, Sandman CA, Porto M, et al. The association between prenatal stress and infant birth weight and gestational age at birth: a prospective investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:858–865. - PubMed

Publication types