Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone
- PMID: 20963407
- DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0322-1
Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supine or prone
Abstract
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has become the preferred first-line approach to most patients with symptomatic urolithiasis. The purpose of this study is to assess the ideal patient position during SWL for the treatment of distal ureter stones. A total of 342 patients included in this retrospective study. 148 (108 men, 40 women) patients were included in the first group and were treated in supine position. The remaining 194 (143 men, 51 women) patients were included to second group and were treated in prone position. This study designed retrospectively. The procedure was accepted as a success if the patient was stone free or had only clinically insignificant fragments (≤3 mm) for 3 months or more after the last SWL session. Before SWL, the mean is one area in the first group was 61.32 mm2 while the mean stone area in the second group was 59.04 mm2 (p = 0.208). Mean energy, Mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves of the first group was 4.65, 3.19 and 3,960, respectively. The same parameters in second group were 4.26, 3.03 and 2,953, respectively. These results show that there are statistically significant differences between two groups with respect to mean energy, mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves (p = 0.003, p = 0.010, p = 0.000, respectively). Success rate was 85.1% in group 1 and 72.7% in group 2 (p = 0.006). Our results suggest that supine position is effective and better than prone position for SWL in patients with distal ureteric stones.
Similar articles
-
Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.033. Epub 2014 Oct 28. Urology. 2015. PMID: 25440820 Clinical Trial.
-
A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.Eur Urol. 2004 Mar;45(3):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.012. Eur Urol. 2004. PMID: 15036682
-
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates.BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23360696
-
The effectiveness and safety between prone position and supine position for ultrasound guided shock wave lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: a multi-center prospective propensity score-matching study.World J Urol. 2024 Dec 25;43(1):46. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05383-6. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39722057
-
Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1783-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2320-9. Epub 2018 May 5. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29730839 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of official technical training for urologists on the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.Urolithiasis. 2013 Nov;41(6):487-92. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0586-3. Epub 2013 Jul 3. Urolithiasis. 2013. PMID: 23821184
-
The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1299-1306. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2244-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29549483 Clinical Trial.
-
Role of Patient Age and Stone Density in Predicting Outcomes of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Lower Ureteral Stones.Med Arch. 2023;77(3):222-226. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.222-226. Med Arch. 2023. PMID: 37700921 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study.Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 20;52(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01512-9. Urolithiasis. 2023. PMID: 38117370
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources