Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;12(6):553-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0160-4.

Biomarkers to predict antidepressant response

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers to predict antidepressant response

Andrew F Leuchter et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

During the past several years, we have achieved a deeper understanding of the etiology/pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, this improved understanding has not translated to improved treatment outcome. Treatment often results in symptomatic improvement, but not full recovery. Clinical approaches are largely trial-and-error, and when the first treatment does not result in recovery for the patient, there is little proven scientific basis for choosing the next. One approach to enhancing treatment outcomes in MDD has been the use of standardized sequential treatment algorithms and measurement-based care. Such treatment algorithms stand in contrast to the personalized medicine approach, in which biomarkers would guide decision making. Incorporation of biomarker measurements into treatment algorithms could speed recovery from MDD by shortening or eliminating lengthy and ineffective trials. Recent research results suggest several classes of physiologic biomarkers may be useful for predicting response. These include brain structural or functional findings, as well as genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic measures. Recent data indicate that such measures, at baseline or early in the course of treatment, may constitute useful predictors of treatment outcome. Once such biomarkers are validated, they could form the basis of new paradigms for antidepressant treatment selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Logistic regression model of escitalopram and bupropion responders stratified by Antidepressant Treatment Response (ATR) Index values. ATR values are shown for patients randomly assigned to each treatment and who responded to escitalopram or bupropion treatment. Patients who responded to escitalopram tended to have higher ATR values, and those who responded to bupropion tended to have lower ATR values. Markers represent observed values, and lines represent modeled values
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Logistic regression model of escitalopram and bupropion remitters stratified by Antidepressant Treatment Response (ATR) Index values. ATR values are shown for patients randomly assigned to each treatment and who remitted with escitalopram or bupropion treatment. Patients who remitted with escitalopram tended to have higher ATR values, and those who remitted with bupropion tended to have lower ATR values. Markers represent observed values, and lines represent modeled values

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greenberg P, Kessler R, Birnbaum H. The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000? J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:1465–1475. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v64n1211. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Hunter AM, Korb AS. A new paradigm for the prediction of antidepressant treatment response. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:435–446. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fochtmann LJ, Gelenberg AJ. Guideline Watch: Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. 2. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2005.
    1. Trivedi MH, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, et al. Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1243–1252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rush AJ, Warden D, Wisniewski SR, et al. STAR*D: revising conventional wisdom. CNS Drugs. 2009;23:627–647. - PubMed

Publication types