Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women
- PMID: 20965482
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.012
Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women.
Study design: A decision analytic model comparing induction of labor at 41 weeks vs expectant management with antenatal testing until 42 weeks in nulliparas was designed. Baseline assumptions were derived from the literature as well as from analysis of the National Birth Cohort dataset and included an intrauterine fetal demise rate of 0.12% in the 41st week and a cesarean rate of 27% in women induced at 41 weeks. One-way and multiway sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of the findings.
Results: Compared with expectant management, induction of labor is cost-effective with an incremental cost of $10,945 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Induction of labor at 41 weeks also resulted in a lower rate of adverse obstetric outcomes, including neonatal demise, shoulder dystocia, meconium aspiration syndrome, and severe perineal lacerations.
Conclusion: Elective induction of labor at 41 weeks is cost-effective and improves outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Discussion: 'cost-effectiveness of induced labor' by Kaimal et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;204(2):e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.016. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21284961 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources