Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jan;20(1):e4.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.036103. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results

Ilze Bogdanovica et al. Tob Control. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether the European Commission Eurobarometer survey of 27 European Union (EU) member states produces reliable smoking prevalence estimates when compared to national prevalence survey data, and to identify approaches to standardising the measurement of smoking prevalence in the EU.

Methods: This was a direct comparison of questions, sampling methods and smoking prevalence estimates, between the 2006 Eurobarometer study and contemporaneous national surveys. All 27 EU member states were included. Participants were people surveyed in the 2006 Eurobarometer study and in various national surveys in the closest year to 2006 for which data were available. The main outcome measures were the mean and range of differences in prevalence estimates between the Eurobarometer and national surveys.

Results: Most national surveys used similar multistage sampling methods and involved sample sizes of 3000 or more, but the phrasing of the questions used to define smoking, the inclusion or exclusion of occasional smokers, the age ranges of participants and the frequency of national surveys varied substantially between countries. The Eurobarometer study used the same questions in all countries but in sample sizes of 1000, or in 3 countries, 500. Eurobarometer 2006 smoking prevalence estimates were on average 0.37 percentage points higher than those in national surveys, but with a 95% range from -10.49 to +11.23 percentage points. At the extremes, the equivalent national prevalence estimate for Slovakia was 13.0% higher and for the UK 10.0% lower than the Eurobarometer figure.

Conclusions: Measurements of the prevalence of smoking, the biggest avoidable public health threat in the European Union, are highly discrepant within countries between national and European Commission survey estimates. Monitoring national smoking prevalence on a regular basis, using standardised methods in representative population samples, is an urgent priority for the EU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
National and Eurobarometer 2006 smoking prevalence estimates for the European Union (EU) countries.

References

    1. Doll R. Tobacco: a medical history. J Urban Health 1999;76:289–313 - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/Tobacco/tobacco_en... (accessed 19 Nov 2009).
    1. Flash Eurobarometer No 253 Survey on Tobacco. Analytical report. Hungary: The Gallup Organisation, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_253_en.pdf (accessed 18 Nov 2009).
    1. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, et al. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ 2004;328:1519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Special Eurobarometer 183/ Wave 58.2 smoking and the environment: actions and Attitudes. Brussels: European Opinion Research Group EEIG, 2003. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/Tobacco/Documents/... (accessed 18 Nov 2009).

Publication types