Macrolane for breast enhancement: 12-month follow-up
- PMID: 20966812
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200ae57
Macrolane for breast enhancement: 12-month follow-up
Abstract
Background: Stabilized hyaluronic acid–based gel of nonanimal origin (NASHA-based gel) is well established for use in aesthetic facial procedures. A new formulation (Macrolane VRF30, Q-Med AB, Uppsala, Sweden) may be suitable for patients seeking breast enhancement. The aim of this study was to develop a reproducible technique for injecting NASHA-based gel posterior to the mammary gland (subglandular injection) and to assess treatment safety and efficacy. The feasibility of dual-plane submuscular injection was also explored.
Methods: Nonpregnant, nonbreastfeeding women with small breasts were recruited for this open-label, noncomparative study. Patients were treated in groups of four to enable step-wise revision of the injection technique. Safety and efficacy assessments (12-month follow-up) included adverse event reporting and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, respectively.
Results: Twenty-four women (mean age, 37 years) were recruited, 20 of whom underwent subglandular injection. A reproducible injection technique was successfully developed that could be performed under local anesthesia. High subject improvement rates for breast appearance (38 of 46 breasts; 83 percent) were observed for at least 6 months after treatment. At 12 months, 69 percent of breasts were still considered improved. Similar trends were observed with patient satisfaction levels. NASHA-based gel was generally well tolerated, with no inflammatory reactions or serious adverse events. Capsular contracture was the most commonly reported adverse event.
Conclusion: NASHA-based gel is a new option for patients who desire aesthetic improvement of the breast but who do not want to undergo surgery. Further studies to confirm these findings in larger numbers of patients are warranted.
Comment in
-
Discussion. Macrolane for breast enhancement: 12-month follow-up.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):861-862. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200aaf9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21285788 No abstract available.
-
The need for clinical trial registration information.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;128(3):830. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182221702. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21866033 No abstract available.
-
Breast enhancement with macrolene: is it a reliable alternative to fat injection?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):572e-573e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6489. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22030527 No abstract available.
References
-
- Sarwer DB, Nordmann JE, Herbert JD. Cosmetic breast augmentation surgery: A critical overview. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:843–856.
-
- Sarwer DB. The psychological aspects of cosmetic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl. 1):110S–117S.
-
- Hedén P, Adams WP, Maxwell P, Nava M, Scheflan M, Stan C. Aesthetic breast surgery: Consulting for the future—Proposals for improving doctor-patient interactions. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33:388–394.
-
- Agerup B, Berg P, Akermark C. Non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid: A new formulation for the treatment of osteoarthritis. BioDrugs 2005;19:23–30.
-
- André P. Evaluation of the safety of a non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA–Q-Medical, Sweden) in European countries: A retrospective study from 1997 to 2001. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18:422–425.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical