Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;32(12):1058-66.
doi: 10.1002/bies.201000087. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes

Sabrina L Andersen et al. Bioessays. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double-strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double-strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non-crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically-proliferating cells and that the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Models for double-strand break repair. A: In the canonical double-strand break repair (DSBR) model proposed by Szostak et al. [6], an initiating DSB is processed to produce 3′ overhangs. One or both of these overhangs can invade a homologous duplex, usually a sister chromatid or homologous chromosome. A D-loop is displaced by the invading strand. The free 3′ end of the invading strand primes synthesis using the homologous sequence as a template. The other resected end of the break anneals to the D-loop, in a process called second-end capture. Additional synthesis and ligation of nicks produces a dHJ intermediate. To resolve the dHJ, two strands are nicked at each of the HJs. If two strands are each nicked twice (once at each junction), NCO repair products are produced. If different strands are cut at each junction (so that each of the four strands is nicked once), CO repair products are produced. B: In synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA), the invading strand is displaced from the D-loop structure and its newly synthesized sequence anneals to the other side of the break. This yields a NCO repair product. C: In dHJ-dissolution, the two HJs are branch-migrated together and then decatenated to produce a NCO.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meiotic and mitotic recombination are fundamentally different in several aspects, including function, initiating lesions, timing during the cell cycle, and outcome. In this figure, a single pair of homologous chromosomes is shown in each nucleus. Both DNA strands of each chromatid are shown.

References

    1. Morgan TH. The method of inheritance of two sex-linked characters in the same animal. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1910;8:17.
    1. Sturtevant AH. The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J Exp Zool. 1913;14:43–59.
    1. Stern C. Somatic crossing over and Segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1936;21:625–730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindegren CC. Non-Mendelian segregation in a single Tetrad of Saccharomyces ascribed to gene conversion. Science. 1955;121:605–7. - PubMed
    1. Holliday R. A mechanism for gene conversion in fungi. Genet Res. 1964;78:282–304. - PubMed

Publication types