Posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia: a cost effectiveness analysis
- PMID: 20972589
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-1022-7
Posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing intensive cytotoxic therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplasia: a cost effectiveness analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a clinical concern in hematological patients with prolonged neutropenia because they are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In a recent randomized trial, prophylaxis with posaconazole was associated with fewer IFI and related deaths relative to a fluconazole or itraconazole (Flu/Itra) control group (p < 0.001). In the current study, a cost effectiveness analysis was conducted to estimate the economic value of posaconazole as an alternative to Flu/Itra when used to prevent IFI in this patient population.
Methods: A decision analysis model was developed using clinical and economic data from randomized comparative trials, the economic literature, and from expert opinion. The data were then used to estimate the incremental cost per life year saved with oral posaconazole prophylaxis relative to Flu/Itra from the Canadian provincial health care system perspective. The base case results were then tested with a sensitivity analysis which evaluated extremes in the incidence of IFI as well as variations in their cost of management.
Results: Prophylaxis with posaconazole provides increased efficacy and an overall cost savings of approximately $Can4,259 per patient. Despite variations in the base case parameters, the sensitivity analysis suggested stability in the primary findings. Posaconazole was associated with an overall cost savings (range = $Can1,765 to $Can4,505) in all of the scenarios evaluated. Optimal cost effectiveness was obtained because the drug was able to avoid the more resource intensive Aspergillus infections.
Conclusions: Prophylaxis with posaconazole in cancer patients with prolonged neutropenia is not only cost effective but also cost saving. The economic benefits were due to the drug's ability to reduce the incidence of high cost fungal infections, particularly Aspergillus species.
Similar articles
-
Posaconazole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease in immunocompromised hosts.Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Mar;29(3):251-68. doi: 10.2165/11206800-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011. PMID: 21309616 Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among neutropenic patients in the United States.Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):666-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00486.x. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19508661
-
Economic evaluation of posaconazole versus fluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infection in high-risk neutropenic patients in Sweden.Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jul;34(7):483-9. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0199-9. Clin Drug Investig. 2014. PMID: 24820968
-
Cost-benefit Analysis of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole as a Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in High-risk Hematologic Patients: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.Clin Ther. 2015 Sep;37(9):2019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Clin Ther. 2015. PMID: 26188835
-
Broad-spectrum antifungal prophylaxis in patients with cancer at high risk for invasive mold infections: point.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008 Feb;6(2):175-82. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2008.0014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008. PMID: 18319049 Review.
Cited by
-
Triazole antifungal agents in invasive fungal infections: a comparative review.Drugs. 2011 Dec 24;71(18):2405-19. doi: 10.2165/11596540-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2011. PMID: 22141384 Review.
-
Budget Impact of Microbial Cell-Free DNA Testing Using the Karius® Test as an Alternative to Invasive Procedures in Immunocompromised Patients with Suspected Invasive Fungal Infections.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Mar;19(2):231-241. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00611-7. Epub 2020 Sep 17. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021. PMID: 32944831 Free PMC article.
-
Posaconazole: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease in immunocompromised hosts.Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Mar;29(3):251-68. doi: 10.2165/11206800-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011. PMID: 21309616 Review.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Posaconazole Tablets for Invasive Fungal Infections Prevention in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients in Spain.Adv Ther. 2017 Sep;34(9):2104-2119. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0600-1. Epub 2017 Aug 14. Adv Ther. 2017. PMID: 28808915 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of voriconazole and fluconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Sep 1;70(17):1518-27. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120599. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013. PMID: 23943184 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical