Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jun;469(6):1781-4.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1628-6. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications

John R Fowler et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in technology and the use of image archiving and communication systems (PACS) has led some institutions to abandon conventional plain film radiography and rely solely on digital computed radiography. The level of accuracy of digital radiography in measuring distances for orthopaedic applications is unclear.

Questions/purposes: Is it possible to accurately measure small distances using digital radiographs and PACS software?

Materials and methods: A model for measuring articular step-off was created using a commercially produced radiographic phantom with predetermined markings at known distances. Radiographs were taken using both indirect and direct computed radiography systems, then uploaded to a PACS system. Eighteen observers measured the distance between standardized, preselected points on the radiographic phantom. The measured values were compared with the known values for each measurement.

Results: The mean measured values differed by 0 and 0.1 mm (SD, 0.5 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring short distances and 1.4 mm and 2.6 mm (SD, 1.0 mm) for indirect and direct radiographs, respectively, when measuring longer distances. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interobserver reliability was 0.82 for indirect and 0.75 for direct digital radiography. The ICC for intraobserver reliability was 0.94 for indirect and 0.90 for direct digital radiography.

Conclusion: Although the mean measured values were very accurate (within 0.1 mm for a known distance of 3.2 mm), the SD of measurements (0.5 mm) could affect the interpretation of data, especially in clinical situations such as evaluating the quality of fracture reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The radiographic phantom used in our study is shown. It is composed of a plastic background imprinted with radiopaque lines at fixed, known intervals.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The distances measured for the indirect digital radiographs are shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almenar Garcia A, Forner Navarro L, Ubet Castello V, Minana Laliga R. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length. J Endod. 1997;23:363–365. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80183-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blokker CP, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial plateau fractures: an analysis of the results of treatment in 60 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;182:193–199. - PubMed
    1. Burger CL, Mork TO, Hutter JW, Nicoll B. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals. J Endod. 1999;25:260–263. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80155-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, Gilula LA, Yamaguchi K, Gelberman RH. Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:792–800. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80016-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Decoster TA, Nepola JV, el-Khoury GY. Cast brace treatment of proximal tibia fractures: a ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:196–204. - PubMed

Publication types