Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;28(8):623-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11604-010-0478-1. Epub 2010 Oct 24.

Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: preliminary results and estimation of inter-rater reliability

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: preliminary results and estimation of inter-rater reliability

Utaroh Motosugi et al. Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate inter-rater reliability and validate magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a tool to measure liver elasticity.

Materials and methods: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at our institution. In all, 10 normal volunteers and 110 patients, who provided written informed consent, were enrolled. The pathological fibrosis score was applied as a standard reference of liver fibrosis in 21 patients. MRE was performed with a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging scanner with a cylindrical passive longitudinal shear wave driver placed over the right chest wall to deliver vibrations. A gradient-echo MRE sequence was used to acquire axial wave images, which were automatically converted to elastograms representing elasticity (in kilopascals, or kPa). The region of interest was placed in the right lobe of the liver on elastograms by two raters independently. To evaluate interrater reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. The elasticity measurements correlated with the pathological fibrosis score (F1-F4) in 21 patients.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient was almost perfect (0.993) between the elasticities measured by the two raters. The mean elasticity value for patients with F4 was 5.7 kPa; F3, 4.4 kPa; F2, 3.1 kPa; F1, 2.2 kPa; and F0, 2.1 kPa.

Conclusion: MRE is a reliable tool to measure liver elasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of differences (D) in elasticities measured by the 2 raters. Absolute value ofD was <0.8 kPa in more than 95% of the subjects and <0.3 kPa in more than 70% of the subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Elastograms of cases with a pathological fibrosis score of F4 showed high intensity (red color) for almost the entire liver. (b) T1-weighted image corresponding to the elastogram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) In case of a patient with F0, the intensity in the elastograms was low (blue color). (b) T1-weighted image corresponding to the elastogram.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scattered plot of elasticity by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) correlated with the pathological fibrosis scores for 21 patients.

References

    1. Perrillo RP. The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1997 Sep;26(3 Suppl 1):57S–61S. - PubMed
    1. Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, Arakawa Y, Ide T, Sata M, et al. Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of Hepatocarcinogenesis by Interferon Therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Aug 3;131(3):174–181. - PubMed
    1. Tsukuma H, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Nakao M, Yabuuchi T, Kitamura T, et al. Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 24;328(25):1797–1801. - PubMed
    1. Glaser KJ, Felmlee JP, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Shear stiffness estimation using intravoxel phase dispersion in magnetic resonance elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1256–1265. - PubMed
    1. Rouviere O, Yin M, Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Burgart LJ, Fidler JL, et al. MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):440–448. - PubMed

Publication types