Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990;6(2):77-84.
doi: 10.1007/BF02398889.

Angiographic morphology of recurrent stenoses after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: are lesions longer at restenosis?

Affiliations

Angiographic morphology of recurrent stenoses after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: are lesions longer at restenosis?

R A Henderson et al. Int J Card Imaging. 1990.

Abstract

Angiographic morphology was analysed in 32 patients who developed restenosis after initially successful coronary angioplasty. The mean minimal luminal diameter of the dilated coronary segments increased from 0.9 mm to 2.3 mm after dilatation, but decreased to 0.9 mm at restenosis. The reference diameter was unchanged after dilatation and at restenosis. Mean stenosis length before the initial angioplasty was 7.0 mm but at the repeat procedure had increased to 8.7 mm (mean increase 1.7 mm, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 2.8 mm, p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in mean trans-stenotic pressure gradient and mean eccentricity ratio between the initial and repeat angioplasty procedures. In individual patients the changes in stenosis morphology were unpredictable, but overall stenoses tended to be longer at restenosis. In some patients stenosis length increased by several millimetres but the success rate of repeat angioplasty was high and the clinical importance of the changes in stenosis morphology are uncertain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1984;10(2):163-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1978 May 1;41(5):865-71 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1985 Jul;57(1):105-12 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 15;53(12):77C-81C - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1981 Aug 13;305(7):382-5 - PubMed