Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 25:11:598.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-598.

Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellites in nematodes, with a focus on the plant-parasitic species Meloidogyne incognita

Affiliations

Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellites in nematodes, with a focus on the plant-parasitic species Meloidogyne incognita

Philippe Castagnone-Sereno et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Microsatellites are the most popular source of molecular markers for studying population genetic variation in eukaryotes. However, few data are currently available about their genomic distribution and abundance across the phylum Nematoda. The recent completion of the genomes of several nematode species, including Meloidogyne incognita, a major agricultural pest worldwide, now opens the way for a comparative survey and analysis of microsatellites in these organisms.

Results: Using MsatFinder, the total numbers of 1-6 bp perfect microsatellites detected in the complete genomes of five nematode species (Brugia malayi, Caenorhabditis elegans, M. hapla, M. incognita, Pristionchus pacificus) ranged from 2,842 to 61,547, and covered from 0.09 to 1.20% of the nematode genomes. Under our search criteria, the most common repeat motifs for each length class varied according to the different nematode species considered, with no obvious relation to the AT-richness of their genomes. Overall, (AT)n, (AG)n and (CT)n were the three most frequent dinucleotide microsatellite motifs found in the five genomes considered. Except for two motifs in P. pacificus, all the most frequent trinucleotide motifs were AT-rich, with (AAT)n and (ATT)n being the only common to the five nematode species. A particular attention was paid to the microsatellite content of the plant-parasitic species M. incognita. In this species, a repertoire of 4,880 microsatellite loci was identified, from which 2,183 appeared suitable to design markers for population genetic studies. Interestingly, 1,094 microsatellites were identified in 801 predicted protein-coding regions, 99% of them being trinucleotides. When compared against the InterPro domain database, 497 of these CDS were successfully annotated, and further assigned to Gene Ontology terms.

Conclusions: Contrasted patterns of microsatellite abundance and diversity were characterized in five nematode genomes, even in the case of two closely related Meloidogyne species. 2,245 di- to hexanucleotide loci were identified in the genome of M. incognita, providing adequate material for the future development of a wide range of microsatellite markers in this major plant parasite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of microsatellite classes in the genome of Meloidogyne incognita. Among the 58 classes identified, the 20 most frequent are shown in individual divisions. The remaining 38 microsatellites are considered in one single division defined as others. For the partial standardization method used to define microsatellite classes, see Methods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Microsatellites detected in the coding sequences of Meloidogyne incognita. (A) Density of microsatellites (expressed as the number of loci/Mb coding sequence). (B) Frequency of the amino acid repeats encoded by the trinucleotide microsatellites.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gene Ontology (GO) assignment of the Meloidogyne incognita predicted proteins encoded by CDS containing microsatellite motif(s). In each of the three GO categories, the percentages of annotated sequences do not add up to 100% because some predicted proteins have more than one GO category assigned to them.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jarne P, Lagoda PJL. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:424–429. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10049-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:435–445. doi: 10.1038/nrg1348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:615–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1–16. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma PC, Grover A, Kahl G. Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:490–4498. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.07.013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types