The validity of self-report weight and height as a surrogate method for direct measurement
- PMID: 20974100
- PMCID: PMC3029506
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.06.001
The validity of self-report weight and height as a surrogate method for direct measurement
Abstract
Bland-Altman analysis used to determine the extent of bias, agreement, and precision between self-report and the "gold standard" of actual weight and height measurement revealed significant discrepancies between methods. Use of self-report data by health care providers and researchers should be made based on the clinical situation, patient safety, and research goals.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307–310. - PubMed
-
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods Medical Residency. 1999;8:135–160. - PubMed
-
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: Analysis of measurement studies. Ultrasound of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;22:85–93. - PubMed
-
- Brener ND, McManus T, Galuska DA, Lowry R, Wechsler H. Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2003;32:281–287. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About BMI for Children and Teens. 2009. Retrieved on January 30, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/about_child....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
