Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 7;286(1):737-45.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.177006. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

Heparan sulfate regulates VEGF165- and VEGF121-mediated vascular hyperpermeability

Affiliations

Heparan sulfate regulates VEGF165- and VEGF121-mediated vascular hyperpermeability

Ding Xu et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

VEGF was first described as vascular permeability factor, a potent inducer of vascular leakage. Genetic evidence indicates that VEGF-stimulated endothelial proliferation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo depend on heparan sulfate, but a requirement for heparan sulfate in vascular hyperpermeability has not been explored. Here we show that altering endothelial cell heparan sulfate biosynthesis in vivo decreases hyperpermeability induced by both VEGF(165) and VEGF(121). Because VEGF(121) does not bind heparan sulfate, the requirement for heparan sulfate suggested that it interacted with VEGF receptors rather than the ligand. By applying proximity ligation assays to primary brain endothelial cells, we show a direct interaction in situ between heparan sulfate and the VEGF receptor, VEGFR2. Furthermore, the number of heparan sulfate-VEGFR2 complexes increased in response to both VEGF(165) and VEGF(121). Genetic or heparin lyase-mediated alteration of endothelial heparan sulfate attenuated phosphorylation of VEGFR2 in response to VEGF(165) and VEGF(121), suggesting that the functional VEGF receptor complex contains heparan sulfate. Pharmacological blockade of heparan sulfate-protein interactions inhibited hyperpermeability in vivo, suggesting heparan sulfate as a potential target for treating hyperpermeability associated with ischemic disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Dermal vascular hyperpermeability induced by VEGF is reduced in Ndst1-deficient mice. A, dermal vascular permeability was measured by Miles assay, in which Evan's Blue was injected intravenously. The amount of dye that leaked into the injection site was measured by absorbance after extraction. Ndst1f/fTie2Cre (WT) and Ndst1f/fTie2Cre+ (labeled as Ndst1 −/−) mice were injected with 200 ng of VEGF165 (n = 20) and VEGF121 (n = 10). Histamine (1 μg, n = 12) was injected as positive control, and PBS with 0.1% BSA (n = 20) was injected as negative control. Error bars indicate S.E. B, dermal vascular hyperpermeability of Ext1f/+Tie2Cre+ (labeled as Ext1+/−) and Ext1f/+Tie2Cre (WT) mice was measured as in A. n = 6–9. C, binding of VEGF165 and VEGF121 to primary lung endothelial cells measured by flow cytometry. VEGF binding to untreated cells is shown as a black line, binding to heparin lyase I-treated cells is shown as a gray line, and the control sample, incubated only with biotinylated antibody and streptavidin-phycoerythrin, is shown as the filled gray histogram. % of Max, percentage of maximum.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Tumor vascular permeability is reduced in Ndst1-deficient mice. A, LLC (4 × 105) were injected into the hindquarters of Ndst1f/fTie2Cre (WT) and Ndst1f/fTie2Cre+ (labeled as Ndst1 −/−) mice. Mice with comparably sized tumors were injected i.v. with 1 mg of Evan's Blue (EB) and sacrificed 1 h later. The amount of dye extravasation into the tumor was measured spectrophotometrically and normalized to the amount tumor mass that was analyzed (wet weight). B, mass (wet weight) of the tumors used in the experiment shown in panel A. C, multiple sections from tumors (n = 4) were stained with antibody to CD31. The density of tumor microvasculature was estimated by counting the number of CD31+ microvessels per 400× microscopic field. D, VEGF expression in tumors was assessed by Western blotting after separation of 20 μg of tumor lysate by SDS-PAGE. Each lane represents a separate tumor. E, sections from tumors (n = 4) were stained with antibody to CD45. The number of CD45+ cells per 400× microscopic field was determined. Error bars indicate S.E. HPF, high power field.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Loss of heparan sulfate attenuates VEGFR2 phosphorylation in response to both VEGF165 and VEGF121. A, dermal vascular hyperpermeability induced by VEGF165 was blocked in Vegfr2+/− mice. Wild-type or Vegfr2+/− mice were injected intradermally with 200 ng of VEGF165 (n = 6) or PBS with 0.1% BSA (n = 6) as negative control. B, chemical analysis of heparan sulfate derived from the mBMEC. Heparan sulfate was isolated by anion-exchange chromatography and digested with heparin lyases I, II, and III, and the resulting disaccharides were analyzed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (34). The number of sulfate groups at each position was determined and expressed per 100 disaccharides. Ndst1−/−, Ndst1f/fTie2Cre+. C, immunoblot analysis of VEGFR2 phosphorylation in mBMEC isolated from mutant and wild-type mice after stimulation with 20 ng/ml VEGF165 for 2 and 15 min (n = 3). D and E, wild-type mBMEC were treated with heparan lyases I, II, and III (Hep I–III) for 15 min and then stimulated with 20 ng/ml VEGF165 (n = 4) or 50 ng/ml VEGF121 (n = 3). Representative immunoblots are shown. The bar graphs represent the relative signal intensity after correction for the background and normalization to the loading control. The average values ± S.E. were determined from the indicated number of replicates. pY1175, phospho-Tyr-1175.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Loss of heparan sulfate attenuates eNOS phosphorylation in response to both VEGF165 and VEGF121. Immunoblot analysis of eNOS phosphorylation in mBMEC cells after treatment with heparan lyases I, II, and III (Hep I–III) for 15 min and stimulation with 20 ng/ml VEGF165 or 50 ng/ml VEGF121 was performed. Representative immunoblots are shown. The bar graphs represent the normalized relative signal intensity. n = 3. Error bars indicate S.E. pS1177, phospho-Ser-1177.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Protamine and surfen inhibit VEGFR2 phosphorylation in vitro and dermal vascular permeability in vivo. A, immunoblot analysis of VEGFR2 phosphorylation in mBMEC stimulated with VEGF165 (50 ng/ml) or VEGF121 (100 ng/ml) for 5 min. Cells were treated with protamine at the indicated concentration prior to application of VEGF. The immunoblots are representative of three similar experiments. B, immunoblot analysis of VEGFR2 phosphorylation was performed as in A, except that cells were treated with surfen. C, mice were injected intradermally with 200 ng of VEGF165 alone (filled squares) or with 12.5 μg of protamine (open squares), and the amount of Evan's Blue leakage was measured; n = 9. D, mice were injected intradermally with 200 ng of VEGF165 alone (filled squares) or with 54 μm surfen (open squares); n = 9. E, mice were injected with 200 ng of VEGF121 alone (filled squares) or with 54 μm surfen (open squares); n = 11. Experimental and control treatments of the same mouse in C–E are linked with a line. PBS with 0.1% BSA was used as negative control, which showed an average leakage of 0.9 ± 0.1 μg (C), 0.8 ± 0.1 μg (D), and 0.7 ± 0.1 μg (E). pY1175, phospho-Tyr-1175.
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
Heparan sulfate-VEGFR2 complexes show a transient increase when stimulated by VEGF165 or VEGF121. A, representative images were obtained by proximity ligation assay. Cells were fixed and incubated with antibodies to heparan sulfate (mAb 10E4) and to the extracellular domain of mouse VEGFR2 (goat IgG) followed by proximity ligation assay reagents. Each red dot indicates an interaction between heparan sulfate and VEGFR2. Nuclei are shown in blue. The Control panel represents cells incubated with 10E4 and nonspecific goat IgG. B, mBMEC were stimulated with 50 ng/ml VEGF121 (striped bars) or 20 ng/ml VEGF165 (white bars) for the indicated time. The data are presented as red dots (Duolink signals)/cell. As a negative control, cells were incubated with mAb 10E4 and nonspecific goat IgG, which gave rise to a background of 3.9 ± 0.3 Duolink signals/cell. The error bar represents S.E., n = 4 separate experiments. C, mBMEC derived from Ndst1f/fTie2Cre (WT) and Ndst1f/fTie2Cre+ (labeled as Ndst1−/−) mice were stimulated with VEGF as indicated and analyzed by proximity ligation assay. The error bars represent S.E., n = 3 separate experiments. All images were taken with a DeltaVision deconvolution microscope (200× magnification), deconvolved with SoftWoRx software and processed with NIH Image J.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mehta D., Malik A. B. (2006) Physiol. Rev. 86, 279–367 - PubMed
    1. Marti H. J., Bernaudin M., Bellail A., Schoch H., Euler M., Petit E., Risau W. (2000) Am. J. Pathol. 156, 965–976 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsson A. K., Dimberg A., Kreuger J., Claesson-Welsh L. (2006) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 359–371 - PubMed
    1. Paul R., Zhang Z. G., Eliceiri B. P., Jiang Q., Boccia A. D., Zhang R. L., Chopp M., Cheresh D. A. (2001) Nat. Med. 7, 222–227 - PubMed
    1. Weis S., Shintani S., Weber A., Kirchmair R., Wood M., Cravens A., McSharry H., Iwakura A., Yoon Y. S., Himes N., Burstein D., Doukas J., Soll R., Losordo D., Cheresh D. (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 113, 885–894 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources