Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
- PMID: 20976479
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1432-0
Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the physicomechanical properties of composite prostheses for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) through standard testing and a proposed classification system.
Methods: Seven prostheses (four with absorbable barriers and 3 with nonabsorbable barriers) were evaluated. The barrier layer was removed, after which the area of the interstices and the diameter of the filaments were determined. The barrier layer was left intact during thickness, density, suture retention strength, tear resistance, uniaxial tensile, and ball-burst testing. Specimens were oriented parallel or perpendicular to their longest dimension during testing. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's posttest or an unpaired, two-tailed t-test was performed to determine whether differences existed due to mesh or orientation, and a p value<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Significant differences were observed between mesh types and due to the orientation of the mesh during testing. Of the absorbable barrier meshes, Bard Sepramesh IP Composite demonstrated the greatest suture retention and tear strengths, followed by C-QUR mesh. Of the permanent barrier meshes, DUALMESH demonstrated the greatest suture retention strength in the perpendicular direction, followed by Bard Composix E/X. DUALMESH and Bard Composix E/X demonstrated equivalent suture retention strength in the parallel direction and equivalent tear resistance in both testing directions. All meshes demonstrated tensile strengths greater than the physiologically relevant range of 16-32 N/cm.
Conclusions: This study provided a basic understanding of how the structural aspects of each mesh design influence functionality. Differences between composite barrier prostheses commonly used for LVHR were observed due to barrier type, mesh type, and orientation. A set of standard testing techniques and a classification system also were presented to define fully the properties of these materials.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of acute fixation strength of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant.Hernia. 2010 Oct;14(5):505-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0670-3. Epub 2010 May 9. Hernia. 2010. PMID: 20454989
-
Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model.Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):604-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1230-8. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20652323
-
Biomechanical evaluation of potential damage to hernia repair materials due to fixation with helical titanium tacks.Surg Endosc. 2011 Dec;25(12):3890-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1816-9. Epub 2011 Jul 13. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21751059
-
A review of the composition, characteristics, and effectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):566-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1899-3. Epub 2011 Sep 5. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21898010 Review.
-
Properties of meshes used in hernia repair: a comprehensive review of synthetic and biologic meshes.J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015 Feb;31(2):83-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1376886. Epub 2014 Sep 5. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015. PMID: 25192272 Review.
Cited by
-
Significant improvement of biocompatibility of polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair by using poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers functionalized with thrombocyte-rich solution.Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Apr 1;10:2635-46. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S77816. eCollection 2015. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015. PMID: 25878497 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing Peer Consensus About the Use of Long-Term Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh for Hernia (Grades 2-3) as the Standard of Care.World J Surg. 2022 Dec;46(12):2996-3004. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06743-2. Epub 2022 Oct 2. World J Surg. 2022. PMID: 36184674
-
PRevention of INCisional hernia after liver transplantation (PRINC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2019 Jun 20;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3477-2. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31221206 Free PMC article.
-
Ventralight ST and SorbaFix versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a porcine model.JSLS. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):549-59. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520125. JSLS. 2013. PMID: 24398196 Free PMC article.
-
When the Mesh Goes Away: An Analysis of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh for Complex Hernia Repair.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Nov 27;7(11):e2576. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002576. eCollection 2019 Nov. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019. PMID: 31942324 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical