Risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment
- PMID: 20978176
- PMCID: PMC2976830
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1245
Risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment
Abstract
Background: As cancer treatments evolve, it is important to reevaluate their effect on lymphedema risk in breast cancer survivors.
Methods: A population-based random sample of 631 women from metropolitan Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, diagnosed with incident breast cancer in 1999 to 2001, was followed for 5 years. Risk factor information was obtained by questionnaire and medical record review. Lymphedema was assessed with a validated questionnaire. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated the relative incidence rates [hazard ratios (HR)] of lymphedema with standard adjusted multivariable analyses ignoring interactions, followed by models including clinically plausible treatment interactions.
Results: Compared with no lymph node surgery, adjusted HRs for lymphedema were increased following axillary lymph node dissection [ALND; HR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.77-3.84] but not sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB; HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58-1.88). Risk was not increased following irradiation [breast/chest wall only: HR, 1.18 (95% CI, 0.80-1.73); breast/chest wall plus supraclavicular field (+/- full axilla): HR, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.48-1.54)]. Eighty-one percent of chemotherapy was anthracycline based. The HR for anthracycline chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.04-2.04), persisting after stratifying on stage at diagnosis or number of positive nodes. Treatment combinations involving ALND or chemotherapy resulted in approximately 4- to 5-fold increases in HRs for lymphedema [e.g., HR of 4.16 (95% CI, 1.32-12.45) for SLNB/chemotherapy/no radiation] compared with no treatment.
Conclusion: With standard multivariable analyses, ALND and chemotherapy increased lymphedema risk whereas radiation therapy and SLNB did not. However, risk varied by combinations of exposures.
Impact: Treatment patterns should be considered when counseling and monitoring patients for lymphedema.
©2010 AACR.
Figures

Comment in
-
Research on risk assessment for secondary lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2715-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0962. Epub 2010 Oct 26. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010. PMID: 20978175 No abstract available.
References
-
- Passik SD, McDonald MV. Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;83:2817–20. - PubMed
-
- Tobin MB, Lacey HJ, Meyer L, Mortimer PS. The psychological morbidity of breast cancer-related arm swelling: Psychological morbidity of lymphoedema. Cancer. 1993;72:3248–52. - PubMed
-
- McWayne J, Heiney SP. Psychologic and social sequelae of secondary lymphedema: a review. Cancer. 2005;104:457–66. - PubMed
-
- Kuehn T, Klauss W, Darsow M, et al. Long-term morbidity following axillary dissection in breast cancer patients -- clinical assessment, significance for life quality and the impact of demographic, oncologic and therapeutic factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;64:275–86. - PubMed
-
- Paskett ED, Stark N. Lymphedema: Knowledge, treatment and impact among breast cancer survivors. Breast J. 2000;6:373–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials