Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;22(6):517-24.
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283404e59.

Reproductive environmental health

Patrice Sutton  1 , Linda C Giudice, Tracey J Woodruff
Affiliations
Review

Reproductive environmental health

Patrice Sutton et al. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is heightened recognition that the environment is an important driver of human reproductive health. This article provides an overview of the nature and extent of the science in the field of reproductive environmental health and its implications for OB/GYN clinical practice.

Recent findings: Women of childbearing age incur ubiquitous contact to numerous toxic environmental contaminants. Even subtle perturbations caused by chemical exposures during critical and sensitive windows of development may lead to increased risks of disease and disability across the entire span of human life. The strength of the evidence is sufficiently high that leading scientists and clinicians have called for timely action to prevent harm.

Summary: OB/GYNs are uniquely poised to intervene in critical stages of human development (i.e., preconception and during pregnancy) to prevent harm. Efforts are underway to provide clinicians with the evidence-based foundation to develop recommendations for prevention. If adopted, current directions in toxicity testing, risk assessment and policy are likely to create important changes in how environmental chemicals are evaluated and regulated in the future. Together, these changes have the potential to assist in clinical assessment of patient risk and reductions in patient exposure to environmental contaminants linked to adverse reproductive health outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Windows of susceptibility
Permission needed: (Modified from Louis et al.[(39)])
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of streams of evidence in clinical and environmental health sciences
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cunningham M, Chronic occupational lead exposure: the potential effect on sexual function and reproductive ability in male workers. Aaohn J, 1986. 34(6): p. 277–9. - PubMed
    1. Hauser R and Sokol R, Science Linking Environmental Contaminant Exposures with Fertility and Reproductive Health Impacts in the Adult Male. Fertil Steril, 2008. 89(2 Suppl): p. e59–65. - PubMed
    1. Rusyniak DE, Furbee RB, and Pascuzzi R, Historical neurotoxins: what we have learned from toxins of the past about diseases of the present. Neurol Clin, 2005. 23(2): p. 337–52. - PubMed
    1. Grandjean P, et al., Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 1997. 19(6): p. 417–28. - PubMed
    1. Grandjean P, et al., Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to “safe” levels of methylmercury. Environ Res, 1998. 77(2): p. 165–72. - PubMed

Publication types