Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec 1;12(6):391-403.
doi: 10.2165/11535990-000000000-00000.

Strategies to prevent cellular rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Affiliations
Review

Strategies to prevent cellular rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Susan W Denfield. Paediatr Drugs. .

Abstract

Despite more than 40 years' experience in pediatric heart transplantation, cellular rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In this review, strategies and agents to prevent acute cellular rejection are discussed. Strategies to prevent rejection are divided into two phases - induction and maintenance therapies. Currently, the most commonly used induction agents are polyclonal antibodies (rabbit or equine antithymocyte globulin) and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (daclizumab or basiliximab). Induction therapies have reduced early rejection, are renal sparing, and can reduce corticosteroid exposure, but have not yet been shown to have a longer term survival benefit. Multiple maintenance immunosuppressants are available. Nearly all regimens include a calcineurin inhibitor (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus). Most combinations in pediatric heart transplantation include an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or, less commonly, sirolimus). Everolimus has seen increasing use in adult heart transplant patients in Europe but, to date, its use is rare in pediatric heart transplantation. The use of corticosteroids as a third agent is still common, but strategies to avoid or minimize their use are increasing. The 'best' combination of therapies varies between studies. By gaining a better understanding of individuals' genetic and environmental risk factors, we may in the future be able to better predict the course of cardiac allografts and enhance our ability to tailor immunosuppression to individual patient variables with the ultimate goal of inducing a state of immune tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update.
    Hirt SW, Bara C, Barten MJ, Deuse T, Doesch AO, Kaczmarek I, Schulz U, Stypmann J, Haneya A, Lehmkuhl HB. Hirt SW, et al. J Transplant. 2013;2013:683964. doi: 10.1155/2013/683964. Epub 2013 Dec 5. J Transplant. 2013. PMID: 24382994 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):141-9 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2004 Dec 21;110(25):3858-65 - PubMed
    1. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 May-Jun;12(3):434-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1968 Dec;22(6):782-90 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):847-58 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources