Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Oct;58 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S287-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02916.x.

An overview of the design, implementation, and analyses of longitudinal studies on aging

Anne B Newman  1
Affiliations
Review

An overview of the design, implementation, and analyses of longitudinal studies on aging

Anne B Newman. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Longitudinal studies have contributed substantially to understanding of aging and geriatric syndromes. These efforts have provided a base of knowledge of the critical factors to consider in designing and implementing new longitudinal studies in older adults. This review highlights some of the major considerations in planning and implementing this type of study. Longitudinal studies can assess change over time and specific disease endpoints. Such projects require multidisciplinary teams with expertise in the many health and contextual factors that must be considered. Recent advances in study design include the use of imaging and biomarkers to assess mechanisms and approaches that raise the ceiling on measurement and integrate assessment of exposures over time. Study implementation requires careful planning and monitoring to maintain fidelity to the scientific goals. Analysis of longitudinal data requires approaches that account for inevitable missing data. New studies should take advantage of the experience obtained from longitudinal studies on aging already conducted.

Keywords: data analysis; longitudinal studies; observational studies; study design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Newman is supported by Grant AG-023629 from the National Institute on Aging (NIA).

References

    1. Guralnik JM, LaCroix AZ, Abbott RD, et al. Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:845–857. - PubMed
    1. Manton KG, Corder LS, Stallard E. Estimates of change in chronic disability and institutional incidence and prevalence rates in the U.S. elderly population from the 1982, 1984, and 1989 National Long Term Care Survey. J Gerontol. 1993;48:S153–S166. - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, et al. Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence: Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA. 1995;273:1348–1353. - PubMed
    1. Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, et al. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF): Major findings and contributions. In: Marcus R, Feldman R, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2007.
    1. Chaves P, Kuller L, O’Leary D, et al. Subclinical cardiovascular disease in older adults: Insights from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2004;13:137–151. - PubMed

Publication types