Factors influencing success in quality-improvement collaboratives: development and psychometric testing of an instrument
- PMID: 21029464
- PMCID: PMC2987374
- DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-84
Factors influencing success in quality-improvement collaboratives: development and psychometric testing of an instrument
Abstract
Background: To increase the effectiveness of quality-improvement collaboratives (QICs), it is important to explore factors that potentially influence their outcomes. For this purpose, we have developed and tested the psychometric properties of an instrument that aims to identify the features that may enhance the quality and impact of collaborative quality-improvement approaches. The instrument can be used as a measurement instrument to retrospectively collect information about perceived determinants of success. In addition, it can be prospectively applied as a checklist to guide initiators, facilitators, and participants of QICs, with information about how to perform or participate in a collaborative with theoretically optimal chances of success. Such information can be used to improve collaboratives.
Methods: We developed an instrument with content validity based on literature and the opinions of QIC experts. We collected data from 144 healthcare professionals in 44 multidisciplinary improvement teams participating in two QICs and used exploratory factor analysis to assess the construct validity. We used Cronbach's alpha to ascertain the internal consistency.
Results: The 50-item instrument we developed reflected expert-opinion-based determinants of success in a QIC. We deleted nine items after item reduction. On the basis of the factor analysis results, one item was dropped, which resulted in a 40-item questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis showed that a three-factor model provided the best fit. The components were labeled 'sufficient expert team support', 'effective multidisciplinary teamwork', and 'helpful collaborative processes'. Internal consistency reliability was excellent (alphas between .85 and .89).
Conclusions: This newly developed instrument seems a promising tool for providing healthcare workers and policy makers with useful information about determinants of success in QICs. The psychometric properties of the instrument are satisfactory and warrant application either as an objective measure or as a checklist.
Similar articles
-
Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives.BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 11;8:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-172. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 18694517 Free PMC article.
-
In-depth comparison of two quality improvement collaboratives from different healthcare areas based on registry data-possible factors contributing to sustained improvement in outcomes beyond the project time.Implement Sci. 2019 Jul 23;14(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0926-y. Implement Sci. 2019. PMID: 31337394 Free PMC article.
-
The development and psychometric evaluation of FABIANA-checklist: a scale to assess factors influencing treatment initiation in anorexia nervosa.J Eat Disord. 2021 Nov 3;9(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00490-w. J Eat Disord. 2021. PMID: 34732246 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
-
Determinants of success of quality improvement collaboratives: what does the literature show?BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):19-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000651. Epub 2012 Aug 9. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. PMID: 22879447 Review.
Cited by
-
What factors influence a Quality Improvement Collaborative in improving contraceptive services for foreign-born women? A qualitative study in Sweden.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):1089. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10060-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37821891 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 14;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-20. Implement Sci. 2013. PMID: 23410500 Free PMC article.
-
Do quality improvement collaboratives' educational components match the dominant learning style preferences of the participants?BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 20;15:239. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0915-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26087653 Free PMC article.
-
Searching the clinical fitness landscape.PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049901. Epub 2012 Nov 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23166791 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1083. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08171-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36002852 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kilo CM. Improving care through collaboration. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1 Suppl E):384–393. - PubMed
-
- Schouten LM, Hulscher ME, van Everdingen JJ, Huijsman R, Grol RP. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;336(7659):1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mittman BS. Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(11):897–901. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources