Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison
- PMID: 21029902
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.027
Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the incidence of flap complications after creation of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps using a zero-compression microkeratome or a femtosecond laser.
Setting: John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Design: Evidence-based manuscript.
Methods: The flap complication rate was evaluated during the initial 18 months of experience using a zero-compression microkeratome (Hansatome) or a femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS60) for flap creation.
Results: The flap complication rate was 14.2% in the microkeratome group and 15.2% in the femtosecond laser group (P = .5437). The intraoperative flap complication rate was 5.3% and 2.9%, respectively (P = .0111), and the postoperative flap complication rate, 8.9% and 12.3%, respectively (P = .0201). The most common intraoperative complication in the microkeratome group was major epithelial defect/sloughing; the rate (2.6%) was statistically significantly higher than in the femtosecond laser group (P = .0006). The most common postoperative complication in both groups was diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) (6.0%, microkeratome; 10.6%, femtosecond laser) (P = .0002).
Conclusion: Although the total complication rates between the 2 groups were similar, the microkeratome group had significantly more epithelial defects intraoperatively and the femtosecond laser group had significantly more DLK cases postoperatively.
Copyright © 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Nov;36(11):1934-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.06.062. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010. PMID: 21029903 Clinical Trial.
-
Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;152(1):16-21.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21507378
-
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):833-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.038. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009. PMID: 19393881
-
Complications of femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis flaps.Semin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep-Nov;29(5-6):363-75. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014.959194. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 25325862 Review.
-
Femtosecond laser in-situ keratomileusis flap configurations.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;22(4):245-50. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283479ebd. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21552126 Review.
Cited by
-
Refractive surgery in systemic and autoimmune disease.Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan-Mar;21(1):18-24. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.124082. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24669141 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why Use Ultrashort Pulses in Ophthalmology and Which Factors Affect Cut Quality.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 8;57(7):700. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070700. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34356980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diffuse lamellar keratitis in the femtosecond-assisted LASIK flap tunnel.Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 3;8:1065-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S64253. eCollection 2014. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24940043 Free PMC article.
-
[Complications of corneal lamellar refractive surgery].Ophthalmologe. 2015 Dec;112(12):982-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-0172-x. Ophthalmologe. 2015. PMID: 26613941 Review. German.
-
Central toxic keratopathy leading to epithelial ingrowth following femtosecond LASIK.BMJ Case Rep. 2024 May 6;17(5):e256508. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256508. BMJ Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38719245
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical