Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;30(1):51-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis

Affiliations

The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis

Jonathan R Studnek et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The identification and treatment of critical illness is often initiated by emergency medical services (EMS) providers. We hypothesized that emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis who received EMS care had more rapid recognition and treatment compared to non-EMS patients.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of ED patients with severe sepsis treated with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT).We included adults with suspected infection, evidence of systemic inflammation, and either hypotension after a fluid bolus or elevated lactate. Prehospital and ED clinical variables and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was time to initiation of antibiotics in the ED.

Results: There were 311 patients, with 160 (51.4%) transported by EMS. Emergency medical services-transported patients had more organ failure (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 7.0 vs 6.1; P = .02), shorter time to first antibiotics (111 vs 146 minutes, P = .001), and shorter time from triage to EGDT initiation (119 vs 160 minutes, P = .005) compared to non-EMS-transported patients. Among EMS patients, if the EMS provider indicated a written impression of sepsis, there was a shorter time to antibiotics (70 vs 122 minutes, P = .003) and a shorter time to EGDT initiation (69 vs 131 minutes, P = .001) compared to those without an impression of sepsis.

Conclusions: In this prospective cohort, EMS provided initial care for half of the patients with severe sepsis requiring EGDT. Patients presented by EMS had more organ failure and a shorter time to both antibiotic and EGDT initiation in the ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of time to initial antibiotic administration in the ED according to provision of EMS care. Distribution of data and median values are presented. EMS – emergency medical services.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of time to early goal directed therapy initiation in the ED according to provision of EMS care. Distribution of data a median values are presented. EGDT – early goal directed therapy; EMS – emergency medical services.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Angus D, Linde-Zwirble W, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 July;29(7):1303–10. - PubMed
    1. Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, et al. National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1928–36. - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327. - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006 June;34:1589–96. - PubMed
    1. Jones AE, Brown MD, Trzeciak S, et al. The Effect of a Quantitative Resuscitation Strategy on Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2734–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances