Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;5(11):2109-14.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.03490410. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

Access to kidney transplantation among the elderly in the United States: a glass half full, not half empty

Affiliations

Access to kidney transplantation among the elderly in the United States: a glass half full, not half empty

Elke S Schaeffner et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Few elderly ESRD patients are ever wait-listed for deceased-donor transplantation (DDTX), and waiting list outcomes may not reflect access to transplantation in this group. Our objective was to determine longitudinal changes in access to transplantation among all elderly patients with ESRD, not just those wait-listed for DDTX.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Using data from the US Renal Data System, we determined changes in the adjusted likelihood of transplantation from any donor source as an indicator of access to transplantation among all incident ESRD patients aged 60 to 75 years between 1995 and 2006.

Results: Access to transplantation doubled between 1995 and 2006 despite an apparent decrease in the likelihood of DDTX after wait-listing. A threefold increase in the likelihood of living-donor transplantation, including a 1.5-fold increase in living-donor transplantation after wait-listing, was a key factor that led to increased access to transplantation. When a lead-time bias related to the increased practice of placing patients on the waiting list before dialysis initiation in more recent years was accounted for, there was no decrease in the likelihood of DDTX after wait-listing. The likelihood of receiving a DDTX after placement on the waiting list was maintained by a threefold increase in expanded-criteria-donor transplantation and a 26% reduction in the risk for death on the waiting list.

Conclusions: Although transplantation remains infrequent, elderly patients were twice as likely to undergo transplantation in 2006 versus 1995. Elderly patients with ESRD should not be dissuaded from pursuing transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cumulative probability of transplantation from any donor source by year of first ESRD treatment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted likelihood of transplantation from any donor source in 2006 compared with 1995 in different patient subgroups. The increased likelihood of transplantation from any donor source was consistently observed in a number of sociodemographic and clinical patient subgroups. The likelihood of transplantation in 2006 versus 1995 was significantly higher in patients who were 65 to 69 and 70 to 75 years compared with those who were aged 60 to 64 years. Deceased donation quintile (states were grouped into quintiles on the basis of rate of deceased donation per million population). $, 0 to 30,117; $$, 30,178 to 37,370; $$$, 37,371 to 47,814; $$$$, >47,418.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Number and type of transplants performed in study patients within 2 years of first treatment for ESRD, grouped by year of first ESRD treatment. The proportion of LD and ECD transplants was higher in more recent years.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Adjusted likelihood of SCD, ECD, and LD transplantation by year of first ESRD treatment. There was no change in likelihood of transplantation from an SCD during the study period until after 2005. In contrast, the likelihood of ECD transplantation increased progressively during the study period, particularly after 2000. Similarly, the likelihood of LD transplantation increased markedly between the years 1995 and 2000 but remained relatively unchanged after 2000.

Comment in

  • Kidney transplants for the elderly: hope or hype?
    Bunnapradist S, Danovitch GM. Bunnapradist S, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Nov;5(11):1910-1. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08731010. Epub 2010 Oct 28. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 21030582 No abstract available.

References

    1. US Renal Data System: 2009 Annual Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2009
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725–1730, 1999 - PubMed
    1. Oniscu GC, Brown H, Forsythe JL: Impact of cadaveric renal transplantation on survival in patients listed for transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1859–1865, 2005 - PubMed
    1. Schold J, Srinivas TR, Sehgal AR, Meier-Kriesche HU: Half of kidney transplant candidates who are older than 60 years now placed on the waiting list will die before receiving a deceased-donor transplant. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 1239–1245, 2009 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gill JS, Johnston O: Access to kidney transplantation: The limitations of our current understanding. J Nephrol 20: 501–506, 2007 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms