A CT-based software tool for evaluating compensator quality in passively scattered proton therapy
- PMID: 21030745
- DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/010
A CT-based software tool for evaluating compensator quality in passively scattered proton therapy
Abstract
We have developed a quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based quality assurance (QA) tool for evaluating the accuracy of manufactured compensators used in passively scattered proton therapy. The thickness of a manufactured compensator was measured from its CT images and compared with the planned thickness defined by the treatment planning system. The difference between the measured and planned thicknesses was calculated with use of the Euclidean distance transformation and the kd-tree search method. Compensator accuracy was evaluated by examining several parameters including mean distance, maximum distance, global thickness error and central axis shifts. Two rectangular phantoms were used to validate the performance of the QA tool. Nine patients and 20 compensators were included in this study. We found that mean distances, global thickness errors and central axis shifts were all within 1 mm for all compensators studied, with maximum distances ranging from 1.1 to 3.8 mm. Although all compensators passed manual verification at selected points, about 5% of the pixels still had maximum distances of >2 mm, most of which correlated with large depth gradients. The correlation between the mean depth gradient of the compensator and the percentage of pixels with mean distance <1 mm is -0.93 with p < 0.001, which suggests that the mean depth gradient is a good indicator of compensator complexity. These results demonstrate that the CT-based compensator QA tool can be used to quantitatively evaluate manufactured compensators.
Similar articles
-
Proton-radiography-based quality assurance of proton range compensator.Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 21;58(18):6511-23. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6511. Epub 2013 Sep 3. Phys Med Biol. 2013. PMID: 24002543
-
Is there a clinical benefit with a smooth compensator design compared with a plunged compensator design for passive scattered protons?Med Dosim. 2015 Spring;40(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Sep 26. Med Dosim. 2015. PMID: 25263491
-
Development of a 3D optical scanning-based automatic quality assurance system for proton range compensators.Med Phys. 2015 Feb;42(2):1071-9. doi: 10.1118/1.4906131. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 25652519
-
Computerized tomography-based quality assurance tool for proton range compensators.Med Phys. 2008 Aug;35(8):3511-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2952645. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18777911
-
Dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion for compensator-based proton therapy of lung cancer.Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jun 21;53(12):3343-64. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/019. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Phys Med Biol. 2008. PMID: 18523345
Cited by
-
Potential of 3D printing technologies for fabrication of electron bolus and proton compensators.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 8;16(3):4959. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.4959. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26103473 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a better understanding of the gamma index: Investigation of parameters with a surface-based distance method.Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6730-41. doi: 10.1118/1.3659707. Med Phys. 2011. PMID: 22149855 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation on Patient/Compensator Scatter Factor for Monitor Unit Calculation in Proton Therapy.Int J Part Ther. 2018 Fall;5(2):38-49. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00021.1. Epub 2018 Nov 30. Int J Part Ther. 2018. PMID: 31773033 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical