Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;16(2):47-54.
doi: 10.4103/0971-6866.69326.

Genetics in public health: Rarely explored

Affiliations

Genetics in public health: Rarely explored

Y B Aswini et al. Indian J Hum Genet. 2010 May.

Abstract

The availability and the integration of genetic information into our understanding of normal and abnormal growth and development are driving important changes in health care. These changes have fostered the hope that the availability of genetic information will promote a better understanding of disease etiology and permit early, even pre-symptomatic diagnosis and preventive intervention to avoid disease onset. Hence, our aim was to review and provide the insight into the role of genetics in public health and its scope as well as barriers. The use of genetics along with their goals and essential public health functions are discussed. From the era of eugenics to the present era, this area has seen many turns in which geneticists have put through their effort to tie together the strings of both molecular genetics and public health. Though still the dark clouds of eugenics, the predictive power of genes, genetic reductionism, non-modifiable risk factors, individuals or populations, resource allocation, commercial imperative, discrimination and understanding and education are hanging above. The technological and scientific advances that have fundamentally changed our perception of human diseases fuel the expectations for this proactive health.

Keywords: Barriers; community genetics; genetics; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collins FS, McKusick VA. Implications of the human genome project for medical science. JAMA. 2001;285:540–4. - PubMed
    1. Bell J. The new genetics in clinical practice. BMJ. 1998;316:618–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Ommen GJ, Bakker E, den Dunnen JT. The human genome project and the future of diagnostics, treatment and prevention. Lancet. 1999;354:5–19. - PubMed
    1. Wallace H. The need for independent scientific peer review of Biobank UK. Lancet. 2002;359:2282. - PubMed
    1. Pass K. Lessons learned from newborn screening for Phenylketonuria. In: Khoury M, Burke W, Thompson E, editors. Genetics and public health in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 385–404.