Similar articles

• [Therapeutic evaluation and the level of proof].

  Cucherat M. Cucherat M. Rev Prat. 2008 Apr 15;58(7):789-93. Rev Prat. 2008. PMID: 18546654 French. No abstract available.
• [Well-founded guidelines must be updated. Continuous updating does not relieve the physician from the obligation to reflect].

  Werkö L. Werkö L. Lakartidningen. 2002 Feb 21;99(8):748-50. Lakartidningen. 2002. PMID: 11894611 Swedish. No abstract available.
• Evidence-based reviews and meta-analysis.

  Evans J. Evans J. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):701-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.001. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20399923 No abstract available.
• A step-by-step approach to the evaluation of clinical studies with therapeutic or preventive objectives.

  Vergara CM, Wang F. Vergara CM, et al. Conn Med. 2003 Apr;67(4):195-203. Conn Med. 2003. PMID: 12760079 Review. No abstract available.
• Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

  Moher D, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Tugwell P, Moher M, Jones A, Pham B, Klassen TP. Moher D, et al. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98. Health Technol Assess. 1999. PMID: 10374081 Review. No abstract available.