Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Oct 29:10:295.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-295.

Patients' functioning as predictor of nursing workload in acute hospital units providing rehabilitation care: a multi-centre cohort study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patients' functioning as predictor of nursing workload in acute hospital units providing rehabilitation care: a multi-centre cohort study

Martin Mueller et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Management decisions regarding quality and quantity of nurse staffing have important consequences for hospital budgets. Furthermore, these management decisions must address the nursing care requirements of the particular patients within an organizational unit. In order to determine optimal nurse staffing needs, the extent of nursing workload must first be known. Nursing workload is largely a function of the composite of the patients' individual health status, particularly with respect to functioning status, individual need for nursing care, and severity of symptoms. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the derived subsets, the so-called ICF Core Sets, are a standardized approach to describe patients' functioning status. The objectives of this study were to (1) examine the association between patients' functioning, as encoded by categories of the Acute ICF Core Sets, and nursing workload in patients in the acute care situation, (2) compare the variance in nursing workload explained by the ICF Core Set categories and with the Barthel Index, and (3) validate the Acute ICF Core Sets by their ability to predict nursing workload.

Methods: Patients' functioning at admission was assessed using the respective Acute ICF Core Set and the Barthel Index, whereas nursing workload data was collected using an established instrument. Associations between dependent and independent variables were modelled using linear regression. Variable selection was carried out using penalized regression.

Results: In patients with neurological and cardiopulmonary conditions, selected ICF categories and the Barthel Index Score explained the same variance in nursing workload (44% in neurological conditions, 35% in cardiopulmonary conditions), whereas ICF was slightly superior to Barthel Index Score for musculoskeletal conditions (20% versus 16%).

Conclusions: A substantial fraction of the variance in nursing workload in patients with rehabilitation needs in the acute hospital could be predicted by selected categories of the Acute ICF Core Sets, or by the Barthel Index score. Incorporating ICF Core Set-based data in nursing management decisions, particularly staffing decisions, may be beneficial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of variable selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot of fitted vs. observed value for the sum of the total nursing workload (patients with neurological conditions).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of fitted vs. observed value for the sum of the total nursing workload (patients with musculoskeletal conditions).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plot of fitted vs. observed value for the sum of the total nursing workload (patients with cardiopulmonary conditions).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royal College of Nursing (RCN) Defining nursing. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/78569/001998.pdf accessed at 07.05.2010. - PubMed
    1. Bridel JE. Why measure workload? Prof Nurse. 1993;8:362–365. - PubMed
    1. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH. Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA. 2003;290:1617–1623. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke SP, Aiken LH. More nursing, fewer deaths. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:2–3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1715–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012247. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms