The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
- PMID: 21035130
- PMCID: PMC3081994
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008
The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research
Abstract
Pilot studies represent a fundamental phase of the research process. The purpose of conducting a pilot study is to examine the feasibility of an approach that is intended to be used in a larger scale study. The roles and limitations of pilot studies are described here using a clinical trial as an example. A pilot study can be used to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, assessment procedures, new methods, and implementation of the novel intervention. A pilot study is not a hypothesis testing study. Safety, efficacy and effectiveness are not evaluated in a pilot. Contrary to tradition, a pilot study does not provide a meaningful effect size estimate for planning subsequent studies due to the imprecision inherent in data from small samples. Feasibility results do not necessarily generalize beyond the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the pilot design. A pilot study is a requisite initial step in exploring a novel intervention or an innovative application of an intervention. Pilot results can inform feasibility and identify modifications needed in the design of a larger, ensuing hypothesis testing study. Investigators should be forthright in stating these objectives of a pilot study. Grant reviewers and other stakeholders should expect no more.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Campden-Main BC, Wegielski Z. The control of deviant behavior in chronically disturbed psychotic patients by the oral administration of reserpine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955 Apr 15;61(1):117–122. - PubMed
-
- Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 3. New York: Springer; 1998.
-
- Goller ES. A controlled trial of reserpine in chronic schizophrenia. J Ment Sci Oct. 1960;106:1408–1412. - PubMed
-
- Jovanovic BD, Levy PS. A look at the rule of three. The American Statistician. 1997;57:137–139.
-
- Jovanovic BD, Zalenski RJ. Safety evaluation and confidence intervals when the number of observed events is small or zero. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997;30:301–6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical