Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;45(5):626-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research

Affiliations

The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research

Andrew C Leon et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May.

Abstract

Pilot studies represent a fundamental phase of the research process. The purpose of conducting a pilot study is to examine the feasibility of an approach that is intended to be used in a larger scale study. The roles and limitations of pilot studies are described here using a clinical trial as an example. A pilot study can be used to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, assessment procedures, new methods, and implementation of the novel intervention. A pilot study is not a hypothesis testing study. Safety, efficacy and effectiveness are not evaluated in a pilot. Contrary to tradition, a pilot study does not provide a meaningful effect size estimate for planning subsequent studies due to the imprecision inherent in data from small samples. Feasibility results do not necessarily generalize beyond the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the pilot design. A pilot study is a requisite initial step in exploring a novel intervention or an innovative application of an intervention. Pilot results can inform feasibility and identify modifications needed in the design of a larger, ensuing hypothesis testing study. Investigators should be forthright in stating these objectives of a pilot study. Grant reviewers and other stakeholders should expect no more.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campden-Main BC, Wegielski Z. The control of deviant behavior in chronically disturbed psychotic patients by the oral administration of reserpine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955 Apr 15;61(1):117–122. - PubMed
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 3. New York: Springer; 1998.
    1. Goller ES. A controlled trial of reserpine in chronic schizophrenia. J Ment Sci Oct. 1960;106:1408–1412. - PubMed
    1. Jovanovic BD, Levy PS. A look at the rule of three. The American Statistician. 1997;57:137–139.
    1. Jovanovic BD, Zalenski RJ. Safety evaluation and confidence intervals when the number of observed events is small or zero. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997;30:301–6. - PubMed