Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;24(8):1110-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.07.012.

Management of lower extremity wounds in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a stratified conservative approach

Affiliations

Management of lower extremity wounds in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a stratified conservative approach

Jason Chiriano et al. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Traditional wound care algorithms include aggressive detection of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and treatment with revascularization for all patients with PAD and lower extremity wounds. Not every patient with PAD and a wound meets Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASCII) criteria for critical limb ischemia. We hypothesize that a conservative approach to selected patients with PAD and lower extremity wounds may be safe, provide acceptable limb salvage, and that failure of this approach does not translate into increased limb loss.

Methods: Veterans referred with PAD and nonhealing ulcers/wounds were prospectively enrolled into our Prevention of Amputation Care Team program. Patients were stratified according to management strategies which included revascularization, primary amputation, palliative limb care, and aggressive local care without revascularization (conservative group). Patients were assigned to conservative management group on the basis of transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TcpO2) and ankle-brachial index (ABI). Healing rates, need for "late" revascularization, major amputation rates, and survival of this conservative group were analyzed in terms of ABI and ankle pressures.

Results: Between January 2006 and March 2009, a total of 190 lower extremity wounds in 178 patients with PAD were analyzed. Forty-nine patients with 52 wounds (27.9%) were deemed candidates for conservative treatment. During mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete wound healing was documented in 33 patients (35 wounds: 67%). Mean time to complete wound healing was 4.5 months. Predictors of healing included mean ABI (0.62 vs. 0.42 [p < 0.001]) and ankle pressures >70 mm Hg (p = 0.025). Sixteen patients (17 wounds: 33%) were not healed at the time of analysis. Of these, three patients (four wounds: 8%) showed active healing and 13 (13 wounds: 25%) failed conservative management. Nine patients (9 wounds: 17%) underwent late revascularization. There was one case of amputation (2%) and six cases of mortalities (12.2%). There was no increase in the rates of limb loss and mortality in patients who failed conservative management and underwent "late" revascularization.

Conclusions: Conservative management of lower extremity nonhealing wounds in selected patients with PAD is successful in over two-thirds of the patients. The failure of conservative management does not increase mortality or amputation rates. When the TcPO2 is >30 mm Hg, the ABI and the TASC II definition of critical limb ischemia predict wound healing and should be key factors in considering conservative therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources