Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks
- PMID: 21038032
- DOI: 10.4193/Rhino09.212
Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks
Abstract
The olfactory test battery Sniffin’ Sticks is a test of nasal chemosensory function that is based on pen-like devices for odour presentation. It consists of three olfactory subtests: threshold, discrimination, and identification. The detection threshold can be measured using two different odorants--n-butanol or PEA (phenylethyl alcohol). Both tasks are commonly applied in published studies, but little is known about the formal comparison of values obtained using them. Unlike the Sniffin’ Sticks with n-butanol as odorant, there is poor validation for the threshold subtest with the odorant PEA. The purpose of this study was to compare these two different odorants. Both odorants were applied to 100 normosmic, healthy subjects (50 females). The experiment was divided into two sessions performed on two different days. After each threshold test the discrimination and identification subtests were conducted. We obtained significant differences in detection thresholds of PEA and n-butanol. The mean score of PEA threshold and PEA TDI (sum of threshold, discrimination, identification) was significantly higher compared to n-butanol. No significant correlation between individual PEA and n-butanol thresholds was observed. The differences between both odorants indicate that a formal validation of the Sniffin’ Sticks with PEA as odorant for probing olfactory thresholds may be required.
Similar articles
-
Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants.Rhinology. 2011 Aug;49(3):331-6. doi: 10.4193/Rhino10.263. Rhinology. 2011. PMID: 21858265
-
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 33533495
-
Validation study of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test in a British population: a preliminary communication.Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02431.x. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 22433135
-
[Clinical aspects of dysosmia and presentation of European Olfactory Test of "sniffin sticks": a review].J Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;34(2):86-92. doi: 10.2310/7070.2005.00086. J Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 16076406 Review. French.
-
Assessment of Olfactory Function in Children and Adolescents: An Overview.Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46:bjab027. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab027. Chem Senses. 2021. PMID: 34237138 Review.
Cited by
-
Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Apr;4(4):298-308. doi: 10.1002/alr.21272. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014. PMID: 24449655 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.Neuroscience. 2011 Aug 25;189:377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.065. Epub 2011 May 7. Neuroscience. 2011. PMID: 21575683 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Korean Culture-Friendly Olfactory Function Test and Optimization of a Diagnostic Cutoff Value.Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;13(3):274-284. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.00864. Epub 2020 Jul 17. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 32668827 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of olfactory detection thresholds in children with autism spectrum disorders using a pulse ejection system.Mol Autism. 2016 Jan 19;7:6. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0071-2. eCollection 2016. Mol Autism. 2016. PMID: 26788283 Free PMC article.
-
Heightened Olfactory Sensitivity in Young Females with Recent-Onset Anorexia Nervosa and Recovered Individuals.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 6;12(1):e0169183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169183. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28060877 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources