Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;20(2):177-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2010.01055.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae

Affiliations

Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae

S K Behura et al. Insect Mol Biol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

The transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are essential components of translational machinery. We determined that tRNA isoacceptors (tRNAs with different anticodons but incorporating the same amino acid in protein synthesis) show differential copy number abundance, genomic distribution patterns and sequence evolution between Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. The tRNA-Ala genes are present in unusually high copy number in the Ae. aegypti genome but not in An. gambiae. Many of the tRNA-Ala genes of Ae. aegypti are flanked by a highly conserved sequence that is not observed in An. gambiae. The relative abundance of tRNA isoacceptor genes is correlated with preferred (or optimal) and nonpreferred (or rare) codons for ∼2-4% of the predicted protein coding genes in both species. The majority (∼74-85%) of these genes are related to pathways involved with translation, energy metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism. Our results suggest that these genes and the related pathways may be under translational selection in these mosquitoes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cluster patterns of tRNA genes in both genomes. A) Val-tRNAs in An. gambiae, B) Pro-tRNA genes in An. gambiae. C). Met-tRNA genes in Ae. aegypti. D). Tyr-tRNA genes in An. gambiae. E) Tyr-tRNA genes in Ae. aegypti. The chromosome/supercontig location, along with start and end coordinates, of each cluster is indicated. The numbers on the right side of each cluster indicates the distance between neighboring tRNA genes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sequence variation within tRNA genes. The tRNA genes of both species show varying levels of average nucleotide differences. Note that tRNA genes analyzed here are all intron-less copies. The tRNA-Tyr genes are not included in this analysis as each of these genes contains an intron in both species.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phylogenetic (neighbor-joining tree) relationships of Tyr-tRNA genes of Ae. aegypti (shown as gene IDs starting AAELs) and An. gambiae (shown as gene IDs starting AGAPs). The scale is shown by the vertical line.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of actin genes show distinct phylogenetic grouping of genes that predominantly show RAIT-dependent codon usage (in bold branching). The genes that show RAIT-dependent codon usage are labeled RAIT after the gene ID.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akashi H. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at “silent” sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics. 1995;139:1067–1076. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson SG, Kurland CG. Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. Microbiol Rev. 1990;54:198–210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Argentine JA, James AA. Codon preference of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Insect Mol Biol. 1993;1:189–194. - PubMed
    1. Behura SK, Stanke M, Desjardins CA, Werren JH, Severson DW. Comparative analysis of nuclear tRNA genes of Nasonia vitripennis and other arthropods, and relationships to codon usage bias. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19(Suppl 1):49–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:3026–3031. - PubMed

Publication types