An audit of platelet transfusion within the Wellington Cancer Centre
- PMID: 21040321
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02358.x
An audit of platelet transfusion within the Wellington Cancer Centre
Abstract
Aim: An audit of platelet transfusion was performed to assess adherence to local prophylactic policy and to assess if therapeutic transfusions were administered in line with international recommendations.
Methods: A prospective audit of platelet transfusion therapy was conducted at the Wellington Cancer Centre in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia over a 3-month period from 26 January 2008 to 30 April 2008. There were 398 episodes of evaluable clinical decision activity generated through either platelet counts <50 × 10(9) /L or platelet transfusion events. Each episode was assessed and defined as either adhering to or breaching the local prophylactic platelet transfusion policy.
Results: Thrombocytopenia and/or platelet transfusion occurred in 63 patients aged 16-84 years with either a haematological or solid organ malignancy. Decisions to withhold prophylactic platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenic patients adhered to policy for 99% of platelet counts <50 × 10(9) /L. Where transfusions were administered, 77% were prophylactic and 23% were for therapeutic indications. Prophylactic transfusions adhered to policy for 72% of platelet counts <50 × 10(9) /L. Adherence to prophylactic transfusion policy for febrile patients with a threshold of ≤15 × 10(9) /L was 84%, compared to 63% for stable afebrile patients with a threshold of ≤10 × 10(9) /L. Where policy was breached, in 80% of cases the platelet count had not reached the prophylactic transfusion threshold. Of the clinical decisions leading to therapeutic transfusions, 67% were deemed appropriate and predominantly a single adult therapeutic dose of platelets was administered. Where multiple doses of platelets were transfused, 86% of these transfusion events either breached policy or were deemed suboptimal management.
Conclusion: The audit demonstrated a high rate of adherence to local transfusion policy. Where policy was breached, predominantly a transfusion had occurred prior to a platelet count reaching the pre-defined trigger. The use of multiple dose platelet transfusions was almost never appropriate. Educating staff in the use of a stringent transfusion policy may lead to reductions in platelet product use.
© 2010 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal © 2010 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
Similar articles
-
Platelet utilization and the transfusion trigger: a prospective analysis.Transfusion. 2007 Feb;47(2):201-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01089.x. Transfusion. 2007. PMID: 17302764
-
Compliance with prophylactic platelet transfusion trigger in haematological patients.Transfus Med. 2005 Feb;15(1):45-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2005.00547.x. Transfus Med. 2005. PMID: 15713128
-
Evaluation of platelet transfusion triggers in a tertiary-care hospital.Transfusion. 2007 Feb;47(2):206-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01090.x. Transfusion. 2007. PMID: 17302765
-
Platelet transfusion prophylaxis for patients with haematological malignancies: where to now?Br J Haematol. 2005 Dec;131(5):588-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05769.x. Br J Haematol. 2005. PMID: 16351634 Review.
-
Thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions in patients with cancer.Cancer Treat Res. 2011;157:251-65. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7073-2_15. Cancer Treat Res. 2011. PMID: 21052961 Review.
Cited by
-
Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):723-733. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000734. Med Care. 2017. PMID: 28498197 Free PMC article.
-
How low can you go: What is the safe threshold for platelet transfusions in patients with hematologic malignancy in sub-Saharan Africa.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0211648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211648. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30726290 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous