Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;126(5):1492-1499.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8bb1.

Evaluation of skull strength following parietal bone graft harvest

Boris Laure  1 , François Tranquart, Laurent Geais, Dominique Goga
Affiliations

Evaluation of skull strength following parietal bone graft harvest

Boris Laure et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Parietal bone grafts are commonly used in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the loss of strength following monocortical parietal bone graft harvest. The secondary aim was to establish a correlation between strength and thickness of calvaria.

Methods: Thirty fresh human cadaver heads (nonfrozen, unembalmed heads) were used for this study. Loss of strength was determined by comparing the maximum impact resistance of bone on the donor side versus the intact side, using a precalibrated pendulum Charpy impact testing machine. Thickness was measured using a surgical navigation system with optoelectronic tracking.

Results: Loss of strength at the donor site was 36 percent (p=0.0000000001) for a 40 percent loss of thickness. Although correlation between these two parameters is rather moderate (r=0.46), it is highly significant (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Although loss of strength is quite significant, serious complications at the donor site are rare. As shown in this study, these risks are nonnegligible. However, because of strong legal pressure, surgeons must carefully weigh the risks incurred by the patient against the expected benefits, whether immediate or deferred. Therefore, the patient should receive well-documented information before such monocortical parietal bone graft harvest is performed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:778–785.
    1. Le Lorc'h-Bukiet I, Tulasne JF, Llorens A, Lesclous P. Parietal bone as graft material for maxillary sinus floor elevation: Structure and remodeling of the donor and of recipient sites. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:244–249.
    1. Wolfe SA, Ghurani R, Podda S, Ward J. An examination of posttraumatic, postsurgical orbital deformities: Conclusions drawn for improvement of primary treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1870–1881.
    1. Krastinova-Lolov D. Mask lift and facial aesthetic sculpturing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:21–36.
    1. Shipchandler TZ, Chung BJ, Alam DS. Saddle nose deformity reconstruction with a split calvarial bone L-shaped strut. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:305–311.

Publication types