Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction
- PMID: 21044964
- PMCID: PMC2994862
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq427
Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction
Abstract
We define personalized medicine as the administration of treatment to only persons thought most likely to benefit, typically those at high risk for mortality or another detrimental outcome. To evaluate personalized medicine, we propose a new design for a randomized trial that makes efficient use of high-throughput data (such as gene expression microarrays) and clinical data (such as tumor stage) collected at baseline from all participants. Under this design for a randomized trial involving experimental and control arms with a survival outcome, investigators first estimate the risk of mortality in the control arm based on the high-throughput and clinical data. Then investigators use data from both randomization arms to estimate both the effect of treatment among all participants and among participants in the highest prespecified category of risk. This design requires only an 18.1% increase in sample size compared with a standard randomized trial. A trial based on this design that has a 90% power to detect a realistic increase in survival from 70% to 80% among all participants, would also have a 90% power to detect an increase in survival from 50% to 73% in the highest quintile of risk.
Comment in
-
Re: Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 2;103(5):445; author reply 445-6, discussion 446. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq552. Epub 2011 Jan 12. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21228315 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Re: Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: a new approach based on risk prediction.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 2;103(5):445; author reply 445-6, discussion 446. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq552. Epub 2011 Jan 12. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21228315 No abstract available.
-
Introduction: Personalized medicine: what is it and what are the challenges?Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):944-945. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.027. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29935651
-
On study designs and hypotheses for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Nov;62:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28838813
-
Precision medicine needs randomized clinical trials.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 May;14(5):317-323. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.8. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28169302 Review.
-
Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 16;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 31096924 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Simplifying electronic data capture in clinical trials: workflow embedded image and biosignal file integration and analysis via web services.J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct;27(5):571-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9694-z. J Digit Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24802371 Free PMC article.
-
Exploiting high-throughput cell line drug screening studies to identify candidate therapeutic agents in head and neck cancer.BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Nov 27;15:66. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-66. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 25428177 Free PMC article.
-
Incorporation of prognostic and predictive factors into glioma clinical trials.Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Feb;15(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s11912-012-0279-z. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23125011 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Innovative methods for the identification of predictive biomarker signatures in oncology: Application to bevacizumab.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Jan 19;5:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.007. eCollection 2017 Mar. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017. PMID: 29740627 Free PMC article.
-
Nipple discharge of CA15-3, CA125, CEA and TSGF as a new biomarker panel for breast cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2014 May 28;15(6):9546-65. doi: 10.3390/ijms15069546. Int J Mol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24879526 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baker SG, Freedman LS. Potential impact of genetic testing on cancer prevention trials, using breast cancer as an example. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(15):1137–1144. - PubMed
-
- Sargent DJ, Conley BA, Allegra C, Collete L. Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):2020–2227. - PubMed
-
- Simon R, Wang SJ. Use of genomic signatures in therapeutics development in oncology and other diseases. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006;6(3):166–173. - PubMed