Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov 23;103(11):1657-62.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605963. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

The utility and cost of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a 16-year institutional review

Affiliations

The utility and cost of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a 16-year institutional review

N B Rettenmaier et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the number of ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) progressive disease cases identified via routine follow-up procedures and the corresponding cost throughout a 16-year period at a single medical institution.

Methods: Previously undiagnosed epithelial ovarian (n=241), PPC (n=23), and concurrent ovarian and uterine (n=24) cancer patients were treated and then followed via CA-125, imaging (e.g., CT scan, chest X-ray), physical examination and vaginal cytology.

Results: In the group of 287 patients, there were 151 cases of disease progression. Serial imaging detected the highest number of progressive disease cases (66 initial and 45 confirmatory diagnoses), but the cost was rather high ($13,454 per patient recurrence), whereas CA-125 testing (74 initial and 20 corroborative diagnoses) was the least expensive ($3,924) per recurrent diagnosis. The total cost of surveillance during the 16-year period was nearly $2,400,000.

Conclusion: Ultimately, serial imaging and the CA-125 assay detected the highest number of ovarian cancer and PCC progressive disease cases in comparison to physical examination and vaginal cytology, but nevertheless, all of the procedures were conducted at a considerable financial expense.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of confirmatory abnormal studies in the surveillance of ovary cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival according to cancer site.

References

    1. Aletti GD, Powless C, Bakkum-Gamez J, Wilson TO, Podratz KC, Cliby WA (2009) Pattern of retroperitoneal dissemination of primary peritoneum cancer: basis for rational use of lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 114: 32–36 - PubMed
    1. Bast Jr RC, Brewer M, Zou C, Hernandez MA, Daley M, Ozols R, Lu K, Lu Z, Badgwell D, Mills GB, Skates S, Zhang Z, Chan D, Lokshin A, Yu Y (2007) Prevention and early detection of ovarian cancer: mission impossible? Recent Results Cancer Res 174: 91–100 - PubMed
    1. Berek JS, Trope C, Vergote I (1999) Surgery during chemotherapy and at relapse of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 10: 3–7 - PubMed
    1. Bristow RE, Purinton SC, Santillan A, Diaz-Montes TP, Gardner GJ, Giuntoli II RL (2006) Cost-effectiveness of routine vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer surveillance. Gynecol Oncol 103: 709–713 - PubMed
    1. Casey AC, Park M, Holschneider C, Bozuk M, Punyasavatsut M, Montz FJ (1996) Apical vaginal recurrence of ovarian carcinoma: presentation, treatment and survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer 6: 200–204

Publication types