Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;38(1):25-40.
doi: 10.1007/s10928-010-9173-1. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4

Marion Bouillon-Pichault et al. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine whether optimizing the study design in terms of ages and sampling times for a drug eliminated solely via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) would allow us to accurately estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters throughout the entire childhood timespan, while taking into account age- and weight-related changes. A linear monocompartmental model with first-order absorption was used successively with three different residual error models and previously published pharmacokinetic parameters ("true values"). The optimal ages were established by D-optimization using the CYP3A4 maturation function to create "optimized demographic databases." The post-dose times for each previously selected age were determined by D-optimization using the pharmacokinetic model to create "optimized sparse sampling databases." We simulated concentrations by applying the population pharmacokinetic model to the optimized sparse sampling databases to create optimized concentration databases. The latter were modeled to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters. We then compared true and estimated parameter values. The established optimal design comprised four age ranges: 0.008 years old (i.e., around 3 days), 0.192 years old (i.e., around 2 months), 1.325 years old, and adults, with the same number of subjects per group and three or four samples per subject, in accordance with the error model. The population pharmacokinetic parameters that we estimated with this design were precise and unbiased (root mean square error [RMSE] and mean prediction error [MPE] less than 11% for clearance and distribution volume and less than 18% for k(a)), whereas the maturation parameters were unbiased but less precise (MPE < 6% and RMSE < 37%). Based on our results, taking growth and maturation into account a priori in a pediatric pharmacokinetic study is theoretically feasible. However, it requires that very early ages be included in studies, which may present an obstacle to the use of this approach. First-pass effects, alternative elimination routes, and combined elimination pathways should also be investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(9):931-56 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2003 Dec;30(6):417-43 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2007 Dec 10;26(28):5162-79 - PubMed
    1. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 Apr;98(1):55-65 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994 Apr 29;47(9):1643-53 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources