Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jun;469(6):1774-80.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1633-9. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Effects of a knee extension constraint brace on lower extremity movements after ACL reconstruction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of a knee extension constraint brace on lower extremity movements after ACL reconstruction

Christopher J Stanley et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Patients have high reinjury rates after ACL reconstruction. Small knee flexion angles and large peak posterior ground reaction forces in landing tasks increase ACL loading.

Questions/purposes: We determined the effects of a knee extension constraint brace on knee flexion angle, peak posterior ground reaction force, and movement speed in functional activities of patients after ACL reconstruction.

Patients and methods: Six male and six female patients 3.5 to 6.5 months after ACL reconstruction participated in the study. Three-dimensional videographic and force plate data were collected while patients performed level walking, jogging, and stair descent wearing a knee extension constraint brace, wearing a nonconstraint brace, and not wearing a knee brace. Knee flexion angle at initial foot contact with the ground, peak posterior ground reaction force, and movement speed were compared across brace conditions and between genders.

Results: Wearing the knee extension constraint brace increased the knee flexion angle at initial foot contact for each activity when compared with the other two brace conditions. Wearing the knee extension constraint brace also decreased peak posterior ground reaction force during walking but not during jogging and stair descent.

Conclusions: Although the knee extension constraint brace did not consistently reduce the peak posterior ground reaction force in all functional activities, it consistently increased knee flexion angle and should reduce ACL loading as suggested by previous studies. These results suggest the knee extension constraint brace has potential as a rehabilitation tool to alter lower extremity movement patterns of patients after ACL reconstruction to address high reinjury rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The patellar tendon-tibial shaft angle (α), ACL elevation angle (β), and knee flexion angle (θ) are shown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The diagram illustrates posterior ground reaction force (Fx), moment arm of posterior ground reaction force (R1), knee extension moment (Mk), and moment arm of the patella tendon (R2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer: NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:694–701. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arms SW, Pope MH, Johnson RJ, Fischer RA, Arvidsson I, Eriksson E. The biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1984;12:8–18. doi: 10.1177/036354658401200102. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 1990;23:617–621. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90054-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berns GS, Hull ML, Patterson HA. Strain in the anteromedial bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament under combination loading. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:167–176. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beynnon BD, Uh BS, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Nichols CE, Fleming BC, Poole AR, Roos H. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:347–359. doi: 10.1177/0363546504268406. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types