Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 21047593
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.034
Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Background: Lead-time is defined as the time by which screening advances the diagnosis compared with absence of screening. A sufficiently long lead-time needs to be achieved so that cancer can be detected while still curable. A very short lead-time may indicate poor sensitivity of the screening test, while a very long lead-time suggests overdiagnosis.
Material and methods: In the first screening round, a total of 56,294 men aged 55-74 years were screened with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in five countries of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with an overall detection rate (prevalence) of 2.8% (1972 prostate cancers). Prostate cancer incidence among 92,142 men randomly allocated to the control arm of the trial was also assessed. Lead-time was estimated as the time required to accumulate a similar cumulative risk of prostate cancer in the control arm to the detection rate in the intervention arm, i.e. from the ratio of detection rate (prevalence of screen-detected cases) and expected incidence (cumulative risk).
Results: Using a serum PSA cut-off of 4 ng/ml, the mean lead-time in the whole study population was estimated as 6.8 years (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 7.9-8.4). It was 8 years in The Netherlands, 6 in Sweden and Finland, 5 in Italy and 4 in Belgium. The mean lead-time was similar, 6-7 years, at ages 50-64 years, but close to 8 years among men aged 65-74 years. A lower PSA cut-off level of 3 ng/ml used in Sweden and The Netherlands prolonged the mean lead-time by approximately 1 year. Lead-time based on advanced prostate cancer only was slightly shorter, mean 5.3 years (95% CI 4.6-6.0). The lead-time for the second screening round was slightly shorter than that for the first (5.9, 95% CI 5.4-6.4), reflecting a similar relation between detection rate and control group incidence.
Conclusion: The lead-time for prostate cancer found in ERSPC substantially exceeded that found for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. One round of prostate cancer screening can advance clinical diagnosis by 4-8 years. Overdiagnosis or detection of non-progressive tumours may contribute substantially to the lead-time.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780157 Review.
-
Why are a high overdiagnosis probability and a long lead time for prostate cancer screening so important?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):362-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp028. Epub 2009 Mar 10. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19276451 No abstract available.
-
Detection rates of cancer, high grade PIN and atypical lesions suspicious for cancer in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3068-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.035. Eur J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 21047588 Clinical Trial.
-
PSA levels and cancer detection rate by centre in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3053-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.012. Eur J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 21047586
-
Epilogue: different approaches for prostate cancer screening in the EU?Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.038. Eur J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 21047595 Review.
Cited by
-
Sleep disruption among older men and risk of prostate cancer.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 May;22(5):872-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1227-T. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013. PMID: 23652374 Free PMC article.
-
An expanded biomarker panel for the detection of prostate cancer from urine DNA.Exp Hematol Oncol. 2019 Jun 27;8:13. doi: 10.1186/s40164-019-0137-x. eCollection 2019. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31297302 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of protein-coding genes associated with metastatic prostate cancer.Endocr Relat Cancer. 2025 Jun 26;32(7):e250070. doi: 10.1530/ERC-25-0070. Print 2025 Jul 1. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40525903 Free PMC article.
-
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy.Turk J Urol. 2020 Jan 17;46(2):115-122. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.19203. Print 2020 Mar. Turk J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32053099 Free PMC article.
-
The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the Prostate-specific Antigen-era.Int J Cancer. 2015 Dec 15;137(12):2795-802. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29408. Epub 2015 Jan 8. Int J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25557753 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous