Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov 4:10:303.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-303.

The challenge of long waiting lists: how we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist' appointments at an Australian public hospital

Lesley A Stainkey  1 , Isaac A Seidl, Andrew J Johnson, Gladys E Tulloch, Tilley Pain
Affiliations
Review

The challenge of long waiting lists: how we implemented a GP referral system for non-urgent specialist' appointments at an Australian public hospital

Lesley A Stainkey et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

OUR PROBLEM: The length of wait lists to access specialist clinics in the public system is problematic for Queensland Health, general practitioners and patients. To address this issue at The Townsville Hospital, the GP Liaison Officer, GPs and hospital staff including specialists, collaborated to develop a process to review patients waiting longer than two years. GPs frequently send referrals to public hospital specialist clinics. Once received, referrals are triaged to Category A, B or C depending on clinical criteria resulting in appointment timeframes of 30, 90 or 365 days for each category, respectively. However, hospitals often fail to meet these targets, creating a long wait list. These wait listed patients are only likely to be seen if their condition deteriorates and an updated referral upgrades them to Category A. PROCESS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM: A letter sent to long wait patients offered two options 1) take no action if the appointment was no longer required or 2) visit their GP to update their referral on a clinic specific template if they felt the referral was still required. Local GPs were advised of the trial and provided education on the new template and minimum data required for specialist referrals. WHAT HAPPENED: In 2008, 872 letters were sent to long wait orthopaedic patients and 101 responded. All respondents were seen at specially arranged clinics. Of these, 16 patients required procedures and the others were discharged. In 2009 the process was conducted in the specialties of orthopaedics, ENT, neurosurgery, urology, and general surgery. Via this new process 6885 patients have been contacted, 633 patients have been seen by public hospital specialists at specially arranged clinics and 197 have required a procedure. LEARNINGS: Since the start of this process in 2008, the wait time to access a specialist appointment has reduced from eight to two years. The process described here is achievable across a range of specialties, deliverable within the routine of the referral centre and identifies the small number of people on the long wait list in need of a procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagrammatic representation of the newly developed process for patients on the 'long wait' list to access a public hospital specialist appointment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kim Y, Chen A, Keith E, Yee H, Kushel M. Not perfect, but better: Primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. Journal General Internal Medicine. 2008;24(5):614–9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0955-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanway A, Oakley A, Rademaker M, Duffill M. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: Comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2004;117(1192):849. - PubMed
    1. De Coster C, McMilllan S, Brant R, McGurran J, Noseworthy T. The Western Canada waiting list project: development of a priority referral score for hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;13:192–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00671.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hacker J, Stanistreet D. Equity in waiting times for two surgical specialties: a case study at a hospital in the North West of England. Journal of Public Health. 2004;26(1):56–60. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health Q, editor. Specialist Outpatient Review Committee S. A report on access to specialist outpatient services in Queensland public hospitals. Queensland Government; 2007.

Publication types

MeSH terms