Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Jan;59(1):142-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.039. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Glans resurfacing for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the penis: surgical technique and outcomes

Majid Shabbir  1 , Asif Muneer, Jas Kalsi, Chitranjan J Shukla, Evangelos Zacharakis, Giulio Garaffa, David Ralph, Suks Minhas
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Glans resurfacing for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the penis: surgical technique and outcomes

Majid Shabbir et al. Eur Urol. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The management of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the penis is controversial, with relatively high local recurrence rates after minimally invasive therapies.

Objective: Report the surgical technique and outcome of partial glans resurfacing (PGR) and total glans resurfacing (TGR) as primary treatment modalities for CIS of the glans penis.

Design, setting, and participants: Between 2001 to 2010, 25 patients with biopsy-proven CIS underwent TGR (n=10) or PGR (n=15), defined as <50% of the glans requiring resurfacing. All patients were surveyed clinically every 3 mo for 2 yr and every 6 mo thereafter.

Surgical procedure: Excision of the glans epithelium and subepithelium of either the entire glans or the locally affected area, with a macroscopic clear margin. The penis was then reconstructed using a split skin graft.

Measurements: Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and rates of recurrence and progression were collated. Complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results and limitations: Mean follow-up was 29 mo (range: 2-120 mo). There were no postoperative complications, and 24 of 25 patients (96%) had complete graft take with excellent cosmesis. Overall, 12 of 25 patients (48%) had PSMs. Only 7 of 25 (28%) required further surgery, 2 of 25 (8%) for extensive CIS at the margin and 5 of 25 (20%) for unexpected invasive disease. Additional surgery consisted of further resurfacing in 4 of 25 cases (16%) or glansectomy in 3 of 25 cases (12%). Those undergoing further surgery had no further compromise to their oncologic outcome. The overall local recurrence rate was 4%. There were no cases of progression.

Conclusions: Glans resurfacing is a safe and effective primary treatment for CIS. The procedure maintains a functional penis without compromising oncologic control, while ensuring that definitive histopathlogy is obtained. Glans resurfacing has a low risk of recurrence and progression. Patients need to be warned that approximately 28% will require further surgery for PSM or understaging of their primary disease, although the need for further surgery does not compromise oncologic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types