Glans resurfacing for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the penis: surgical technique and outcomes
- PMID: 21050658
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.039
Glans resurfacing for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the penis: surgical technique and outcomes
Abstract
Background: The management of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the penis is controversial, with relatively high local recurrence rates after minimally invasive therapies.
Objective: Report the surgical technique and outcome of partial glans resurfacing (PGR) and total glans resurfacing (TGR) as primary treatment modalities for CIS of the glans penis.
Design, setting, and participants: Between 2001 to 2010, 25 patients with biopsy-proven CIS underwent TGR (n=10) or PGR (n=15), defined as <50% of the glans requiring resurfacing. All patients were surveyed clinically every 3 mo for 2 yr and every 6 mo thereafter.
Surgical procedure: Excision of the glans epithelium and subepithelium of either the entire glans or the locally affected area, with a macroscopic clear margin. The penis was then reconstructed using a split skin graft.
Measurements: Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and rates of recurrence and progression were collated. Complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.
Results and limitations: Mean follow-up was 29 mo (range: 2-120 mo). There were no postoperative complications, and 24 of 25 patients (96%) had complete graft take with excellent cosmesis. Overall, 12 of 25 patients (48%) had PSMs. Only 7 of 25 (28%) required further surgery, 2 of 25 (8%) for extensive CIS at the margin and 5 of 25 (20%) for unexpected invasive disease. Additional surgery consisted of further resurfacing in 4 of 25 cases (16%) or glansectomy in 3 of 25 cases (12%). Those undergoing further surgery had no further compromise to their oncologic outcome. The overall local recurrence rate was 4%. There were no cases of progression.
Conclusions: Glans resurfacing is a safe and effective primary treatment for CIS. The procedure maintains a functional penis without compromising oncologic control, while ensuring that definitive histopathlogy is obtained. Glans resurfacing has a low risk of recurrence and progression. Patients need to be warned that approximately 28% will require further surgery for PSM or understaging of their primary disease, although the need for further surgery does not compromise oncologic control.
Copyright © 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Glans resurfacing for precancerous and superficially invasive carcinomas of the glans penis: Pathological specimen handling and reporting.Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015 May;32(3):232-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 27. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015. PMID: 25662797 Review.
-
Long-term outcome of excisional organ sparing surgery for carcinoma of the penis.J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1303-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.084. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21862071
-
Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2218-20, discussion 2220. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181225.31468.82. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 16280767
-
Mohs micrographic surgery for penile cancer: management and long-term followup.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1980-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.039. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17869306
-
Surgical management of penile carcinoma in situ: results from an international collaborative study and review of the literature.BJU Int. 2018 Mar;121(3):393-398. doi: 10.1111/bju.14037. Epub 2017 Oct 24. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 28972681 Review.
Cited by
-
Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 May;13(5):249-57. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.54. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27001013 Review.
-
Advances in penile-sparing surgical approaches.Asian J Urol. 2022 Oct;9(4):359-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 25. Asian J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36381598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Penile cancer: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO Open. 2024 Jul;9(7):103481. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103481. Epub 2024 Jul 11. ESMO Open. 2024. PMID: 39089768 Free PMC article.
-
An update on penile reconstruction.Asian J Androl. 2011 May;13(3):391-4. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.29. Asian J Androl. 2011. PMID: 21540867 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review of penile reconstructive techniques.Int J Impot Res. 2021 Apr;33(3):243-250. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0246-4. Epub 2020 Mar 9. Int J Impot Res. 2021. PMID: 32152468 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous