Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;10(12):886-92.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70201-2. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

Priorities for tuberculosis research: a systematic review

Affiliations

Priorities for tuberculosis research: a systematic review

Jamie Rylance et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Reliable and relevant research can help to improve tuberculosis control worldwide. In recent years, various organisations have assessed research needs and proposed priorities for tuberculosis. We summarise existing priority statements and assess the rigour of the methods used to generate them. We found 33 documents that specifically outline priorities in tuberculosis research. The top priority areas were drug development (28 articles), diagnosis and diagnostic tests (27), epidemiology (20), health services research (16), basic research (13), and vaccine development and use (13). The most focused questions were on the treatment and prevention of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in people co-infected with HIV. Methods used to identify these priorities were varied. Improvements can be made to ensure the process is more rigorous and transparent, and to use existing research or systematic reviews more often. WHO, Stop TB Partnership, and other organisations could adopt an incremental process of priority development, building on the existing knowledge base.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flow chart of study selection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . Global tuberculosis control: a short update to the 2009 report. WHO/HTM/TB/2009426. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2009. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598866_eng.pdf (accessed July 1, 2010).
    1. WHO and Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) Priority setting methodologies in health research. World Health Organization; Geneva: April 10–11, 2008. http://apps.who.int/tdr/stewardship/pdf/Priority_setting_Workshop_Summar... (accessed July 1, 2010).
    1. Agarwal N. Tuberculosis research and development: a critical analysis of funding trends, 2005–2007 an update. Treatment Action Group; New York: March, 2009. http://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/uploadedFiles/About/Publications/TAG... (accessed July 1, 2010).
    1. Stop TB Partnership and WHO . The global plan to stop TB, 2006–2015. Stop TB Partnership and World Health Organization; Geneva: 2006. http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/global/plan/GlobalPlanFinal.pdf (accessed Aug 28, 2009).
    1. Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) Priority setting for health research: toward a management process for low and middle income countries. COHRED; 2006. http://www.cohred.org/sites/default/files/WP1_PrioritySetting.pdf (accessed June 17, 2009).

Publication types