Acute lead dislodgements and in-hospital mortality in patients enrolled in the national cardiovascular data registry implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry
- PMID: 21050975
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.037
Acute lead dislodgements and in-hospital mortality in patients enrolled in the national cardiovascular data registry implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to describe the incidence of acute lead dislodgements and the consequences of these events in patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry.
Background: Lead dislodgements are common adverse events in patients undergoing ICD implants. Little is known regarding who is at risk and the consequences of these events.
Methods: Patients enrolled between April 2006 and September 2008 were included. Acute lead dislodgement was defined as movement of the lead requiring another procedure for repositioning before discharge.
Results: Acute dislodgement occurred in 2,628 of 226,764 patients. Univariate variables associated with dislodgements included older age, female sex, and patients with atrial fibrillation, chronic lung disease, cerebrovascular disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and lower ejection fractions (all p < 0.002). After multivariate adjustment, factors associated with an increased risk for dislodgement included New York Heart Association functional class IV heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, having a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator device, and procedures performed by physicians trained under alternative pathways. A teaching/training hospital setting was not a factor (p = 0.64). Acute dislodgements had increased odds for other adverse events including cardiac arrest, cardiac tamponade, device infection, pneumothorax, and in-hospital death even after adjustment for potential confounders (all p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Acute lead dislodgements occur more often in patients with more comorbidities and in patients undergoing implants by nonelectrophysiology-trained implanters. These events were strongly associated with increased odds for in-hospital death.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.039. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21867834
-
The relation between hospital procedure volume and complications of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Sep 28;56(14):1133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.007. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20863954
-
Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry.Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16):1553-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976076. Epub 2010 Oct 4. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20921437
-
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun 1;5(3):587-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964676. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22715237 Review. No abstract available.
-
Treatment of arrhythmias and use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to improve survival in elderly patients with cardiac disease.Clin Geriatr Med. 2007 Feb;23(1):205-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2006.08.010. Clin Geriatr Med. 2007. PMID: 17126763 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of Early Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Lead Dislodgement in the Elderly.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214766. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36429483 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection after Early versus Delayed Lead Repositioning.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 9;11(4):117. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040117. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38667735 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of two suturing techniques in terms of lead stabilizing efficiency in acute and chronic terms.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Sep;68(6):1295-1306. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02060-5. Epub 2025 May 8. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025. PMID: 40338435
-
Novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy system provides equivalent CRT responses with less complications than a conventional three-lead system: Results from the QP ExCELs lead registry.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1784-1792. doi: 10.1111/jce.14552. Epub 2020 Jun 1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32412126 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal trends and long-term outcomes among recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator in the United States, 2011-2015: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Apr 2;3(4):405-414. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Aug. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022. PMID: 36097450 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous