Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;31(11):1487-94.
doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.115.

Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Affiliations

Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression study in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Yi Guo et al. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Aim: To construct a system for selecting reference genes (RGs) and to select the most optimal RGs for gene expression studies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods: The total RNAs from 20 NPC samples were each labeled with Cy5-dUTP. To create a common control, the total RNA from 15 nasopharyngeal phlogistic (NP) tissues was mixed and labeled via reverse transcription with Cy3-dUTP. cDNA microarrays containing 14 112 genes were then performed. A mathematical approach was constructed to screen stably expressed genes from the microarray data. Using this method, three genes (YARS, EIF3S7, and PFDN1) were selected as candidate RGs. Furthermore, 7 commonly used RGs (HPRT1, GAPDH, TBP, ACTB, B2M, G6PDH, and HBB) were selected as additional potential RGs. Real-time PCR was used to detect these 10 candidate genes' expression levels and the geNorm program was used to find the optimal RGs for NPC studies.

Results: On the basis of the 10 candidate genes' expression stability level, geNorm analysis identified the optimal single RG (YARS or HPRT1) and the most suitable set of RGs (HPRT1, YARS, and EIF3S7) for NPC gene expression studies. In addition, this analysis determined that B2M, G6PDH, and HBB were not appropriate for use as RGs. Interestingly, ACTB was the least stable RG in our study, even though previous studies had indicated that it was one of the most stable RGs. Three novel candidate genes (YARS, EIF3S7, and PFDN1), which were selected from microarray data, were all identified as suitable RGs for NPC research. A RG-selecting system was then constructed, which combines microarray data analysis, a literature screen, real-time PCR, and bioinformatic analysis.

Conclusion: We construct a RG-selecting system that helps find the optimal RGs. This process, applied to NPC research, determined the single RG (YARS or HPRT1) and the set of RGs (HPRT1, YARS, and EIF3S7) that are the most suitable internal controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selecting potential reference genes. According to gene expression levels, all housekeeping genes in cDNA microarrays were ranked by S score. The distribution of the housekeeping genes' S scores is shown here. This distribution includes the S scores of the three genes (YARS, EIF3S7, and PFDN1) with the lowest S scores. In previously published NPC studies, the 4 genes used most frequently as internal control genes were GAPDH, ACTB, HBB, and HPRT1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression levels of candidate reference genes in NPC and NP samples. Values are given as real-time PCR cycle threshold numbers (Ct values). Boxes represent the lower and upper quartiles with medians; bars represent the ranges for the data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
GeNorm analysis of 10 candidate genes. (A) The stability parameter M, which was calculated for each gene in every calculation round, is plotted on the Y axis. The X axis shows the 10 genes ranked according to their expression stability. (B) geNorm calculated NF from leastwise 2 genes to determine the optimal number of reference genes. V is defined as the pairwise variation between 2 sequential NFn and NFn+1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The strategy of selecting reference genes.

References

    1. Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol. 2002;29:23–39. - PubMed
    1. Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;25:169–93. - PubMed
    1. Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:856–62. - PubMed
    1. Bilodeau-Goeseels S, Schultz GA. Changes in the relative abundance of various housekeeping gene transcripts in in vitro-produced early bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;47:413–20. - PubMed
    1. Zhong H, Simons JW. Direct comparison of GAPDH, beta-actin, cyclophilin, and 28S rRNA as internal standards for quantifying RNA levels under hypoxia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;259:523–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms